Trust and Dialogue in the Army Profession

Abstract

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. SAMS SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) CGSC SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)Command and General Staff College (CGSC) 1 Reynolds Avenue Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027 SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S) DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES ABSTRACTTrust is an essential element that forms the core of the professional military ethic. As a foundational concept, trust, from an organizational perspective, facilitates the lasting commitment to meet strategic aims. Trust involves the expectation that the object of trust will behave in a favorable manner, or at least a non-harmful manner, and includes the willingness of a person to be vulnerable to the actions of another based on this expectation. Trust binds the Army together as a cohesive unit. However, internal to the Army profession, defined more directly as the Officer Corps, there is the perception of serious erosion of trust perhaps reaching dangerously dysfunctional levels.The mechanisms and building blocks for trust revolve around communication and relationships. In order to build relationships that foster trust, one must engage in communication. However, for the Army profession, the concept of communication is misunderstood. More importantly, the Army as a profession does not truly understand the concept of dialogue. This lack of understanding has allowed the perceived erosion of trust amongst the Officer Corps.This monograph seeks to address this issue by defining trust and the profession. It identifies the source of the perceived trust erosion within the profession. It provides a more complete definition of communication involving the concepts of discourse, dialogue and discussion, emphasizing the use of dialogue. It shows how the Army in attempting to build a learning organization, has failed to include dialogue in its efforts. Finally, this monograph provides recommendations on how the Army profession can seek to rebuild and sustain trust in the future through these concepts. Trust is an essential element that forms the core of the professional military ethic. As a foundational concept, trust, from an organizational perspective, facilitates the lasting commitment to meet strategic aims. Trust involves the expectation that the object of trust will behave in a favorable manner, or at least a non-harmful manner, and includes the willingness of a person to be vulnerable to the actions of another based on this expectation. Trust binds the Army together as a cohesive unit. However, internal to the Army profession, defined more directly as the Officer Corps, there is the perception of serious erosion of trust perhaps reaching dangerously ...

The Theology of Community Survival: A Study of Migration Theology, Pentecostalism, and West Kalimantan Gawai Culture

“…Toronto Blessing was a phenomenon on January 20, 1994, which became the forerunner to the phenomenon of laughing in the Spirit. 28 This laughter was resulted from the joy supernaturally given to people in Pentecostal meetings. Miraculous healings and relief from depression and stress often accompany the joy of the Holy Spirit.…”

How International School Administrators Build Trust

“…Administrators can provide teachers with flexible school structures, such as professional learning communities, that promote collaboration and shared decision-making to help build trust (Fisler, 2002;Gilmore, 2007;Riveros et al, 2013). To further build trust, administrators may need to empower their teachers (Lewis, 2008;Moye et al, 2005). All these actions not only build trust but may also foster teacher leadership.…”

“…Several studies suggest there is a connection between teacher empowerment and trust. As an example, Lewis (2008) conducted a mixed-methods study in a large school district in Ontario, Canada to understand leadership practices that establish trust between teachers and principals. The researcher surveyed teachers and administrators in 25 secondary and 140 elementary schools and followed up with interviews.…”

“…Administrators trusted teachers as professionals to improve their schools through autonomy, empowerment, and decisions teachers made. To build trust, Handford and Leithwood (2013) as well as Lewis (2008) found that administrators need to offer reciprocal trust. In those studies, administrators built trust when they empowered their teachers to make decisions and treated teachers with respect.…”

Sweden’s Covid-19 Strategy from a Leadership Perspective: Importance of Trust and Role Models

“…Other definitions stress an individual's willingness to be vulnerable to another individual (e.g., a leader, subordinate or peer; Deutsch, 1958;Mayer, Davis, & Schoorman, 1995). Trust in leaders affects other individuals' willingness to accept the leader's motivational influence to become better group members and improve as a person (Sweeney, Thompson, & Blanton, 2009) and their willingness to follow directives and take on risks (Collins & Jacobs, 2002). Trust has also been found to help individuals in a group or organization to direct their efforts toward a common goal, instead of focusing on individual doubts and personal motives (Dirks & Skarlicki, 2004).…”