Trust and social capital in the design and evolution of institutions for collective action

Abstract

This paper aims at developing an original account of trust in the framework of large scale, international collective action institutions. Our research question focuses on the structures and mechanisms that are necessary to sustain the trust needed to uphold the effective operation of institutions for collective action. Our theoretical framework for studying trust is based on the social capital theory. Social capital is defined as the features of social organization, such as trust, networks and norms that facilitate coordination and cooperation for mutual benefit. We claim that in different sectors and contexts stakeholders encounter difficulties in collaborating in setting up experimental institutions for collective action. In order to generate more collaboration, stakeholders need to create structures that incite actors to find better ways to sustain trust, to integrate the 1 Equal contribution by the first two authors. 152 Benjamin Six et al. process of sustaining trust in the organization, and to nourish it with the precise normative idea behind the institutional apparatus. In the plant and biomedical sector, stakeholders have encountered difficulties in sustaining trust while experimenting with different coordination mechanisms for dealing with the increased appropriation of knowledge through patents. Our analysis of some examples from the plant and biomedical sector suggest that institutions could be understood as complex pragmatic connectors of trust, i.e. social matrices of collective action that sustain individual commitment, where routine and reflexivity drive trust-based coordination mechanisms in interaction with their environment.

Taking stock of the local impacts of community owned renewable energy: A review and research agenda

“…'Being part of' is more important in stigmatised areas where energy projects are perceived to improve the image of the area, while 'having the option to influence' aspects over siting and design is likely to be more important in areas where landscape characteristics are an integral part of self-identity [130]. These socio-psychological perceptions in turn dominate and colour objective arguments for and against renewable energy developments, including environmental, noise impacts and local material benefits [129,130,132,133]. In this context, trust, which is frequently cited as a precondition of local support for renewable energy [4,51,79,122,134], represents a resource established and maintained through social interaction on the basis of common interest that enables residents to assume that project managers will act in their best interests without the need to become personally involved.…”

Moral Obligation, Public Leadership, and Collective Action for Epidemic Prevention and Control: Evidence from the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Emergency

“…Social capital mainly functions through two paths. One is to promote the individual sharing of information and achieve resource integration through individuals' embedded social networks and social trust, thereby reducing the uncertainty of choice [8,9]. The second is to restrict and guide individual behaviors through social norms, thereby suppressing the occurrence of opportunism [10].…”

A balance of trust in the use of government administrative data

“…O'Neill makes the striking point that 'trust is needed not because everything is wholly predictable, let alone wholly guaranteed, but on the contrary because life has to be led without guarantees ' (2002b, p. 24). Similar arguments have been put forward, for example, by Six et al (2015) who describe trust as 'a lubricant' that enables the smooth running of actions, and view trust as an antidote to being stuck in inertia (p. 155). This links with the notion that trust has an important part to play in enabling cooperative social relations (Luhmann 1980;Putnam 1993;Fukuyama 1995).…”