2022 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/ichms56717.2022.9980623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trust in AI-Enabled Decision Support Systems: Preliminary Validation of MAST Criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This same additional context could help improve performance in security operations. DHS is currently funding research through its Center for Accelerating Operational Efficiency (CAOE) that is focused on evaluating the Multisource AI Scorecard Table for System Evaluation (MAST) (Blasch et al, 2021) criteria as a checklist for assessing trust in AI-enabled decision support systems across users with different skills and various types of work environments (Chiou et al, n.d.). It would be interesting to know if automated face matching systems that provide this type of feedback to professional screeners result in higher on MAST criteria (i.e., are rated more understandable and trustworthy) and are associated with increased performance (shorter reaction time, greater sensitivity and accuracy).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This same additional context could help improve performance in security operations. DHS is currently funding research through its Center for Accelerating Operational Efficiency (CAOE) that is focused on evaluating the Multisource AI Scorecard Table for System Evaluation (MAST) (Blasch et al, 2021) criteria as a checklist for assessing trust in AI-enabled decision support systems across users with different skills and various types of work environments (Chiou et al, n.d.). It would be interesting to know if automated face matching systems that provide this type of feedback to professional screeners result in higher on MAST criteria (i.e., are rated more understandable and trustworthy) and are associated with increased performance (shorter reaction time, greater sensitivity and accuracy).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information relevance is critical for user decision making. The evaluation of relevance can be viewed from different evaluation and reporting requirements such as with the Multi-source AI Scorecard Table (MAST) [33,34]. Among the nine MAST criteria used for determining the value of an information fusion system, "relevance" elements include:…”
Section: Information Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of generative approaches, data augmentation through a digital twin can be viewed as a "what-if" scenario to check on the integrity of the processing and reduce uncertainty. The DT can provide Analysis of Alternatives to support user decision making [76,77]…”
Section: Aerospace Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%