Trust in Risky Messages: The Role of Prior Attitudes

Abstract

Risk perception researchers have observed a "negativity bias" for hazard-related information. Messages indicating the presence of risk seem to be trusted more than messages indicating the absence of risk, and risk perceptions seem more affected by negative than positive information. Two experiments were conducted to examine alternative explanations of this finding within the area of food additives. Study 1 (N = 235) extended earlier work by (a) unconfounding message valence (positive or negative) from message extremity (definite or null finding) and (b) exploring the role of prior attitudes. Results suggested that negative/risky messages were indeed trusted more even when extremity was taken into account. However, prior attitudes significantly moderated the effect of message valence on trust. Positive messages were distrusted only by those with negative prior attitudes. Study 2 (N = 252), further explored the role of prior attitudes and extended the work by examining reactions to risky messages about a positively viewed additive--a vitamin. The results again found a moderating effect of prior attitudes on message valence. Participants had greater confidence in messages that were more congruent with their prior attitudes, irrespective of valence. Furthermore, positive messages had a greater impact on risk perception than negative messages. These findings suggest that greater trust in negative messages about hazards may be a product of a "confirmatory" rather than a "negativity" bias.

The Effects of Management’s Preannouncement Strategies on Investors’ Judgments of the Trustworthiness of Management

“…Slovic (1993) provides additional evidence consistent with the asymmetry principle in the context of news events related to the management of a large, local nuclear power plant. More recent evidence supports the asymmetry principle in the context of health dangers (Siegrist and Cvetkovich, 2001) and the food supply industry (Cvetkovich et al, 2002;White et al, 2003).…”

Learning you are “at risk”: seniors’ experiences of nutrition risk screening

“…Trust in health messages appears to be higher when information is congruent with prior ways of thinking (White et al 2003). The mental models approach to risk communication suggests that risk should be presented using people's health beliefs and understanding of risk as the starting point (Morgan et al 2002).…”

Trust in Biotechnology Risk Managers: Insights from the United Kingdom, 1996-2002

“…We do not think these explanations are relevant in this case because the events reported in the media were actual events, not policy related (e.g., commingling of GM and non-GM crops was found, or evidence was reported that GM foods were harmful) and because the harms were potentially serious (e.g., sickness or death from the consumption of adulterated foods). Another possibility is suggested by White, Pahl, Buehner and Haye (2003) and Poortinga and Pidgeon (2004), who proposed the confirmatory bias hypothesis. In their view the prior beliefs and attitudes of people influence how they react to media events.…”