Trust in science and scientists among university students, staff, and faculty of a large, diverse university in Los Angeles during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trojan Pandemic Response Initiative

Abstract

Background Mistrust in science and scientists may adversely influence the rate of COVID-19 vaccination and undermine public health initiatives to reduce virus transmission. Methods Students, staff and faculty responded to an email invitation to complete an electronic survey. Surveys included 21-items from the Trust in Science and Scientists Inventory questionnaire. Responses were coded so higher scores indicated a higher trust in science and scientists, A linear regression model including sex, age group, division, race and ethnicity, political affiliation, and history of COVID-19, was used to determine variables significantly associated with trust in science and scientists scores at the p < 0.05 level. Results Participants were mostly female (62.1%), Asian (34.7%) and White (39.5%) and students (70.6%). More than half identified their political affiliation as Democrat (65%). In the final regression model, all races and ethnicities had significantly lower mean trust in science and scientists scores than White participants [Black ($$B$$= -0.42, 95% CI: -0.55, -0.43, p < 0.001); Asian ($$B$$= -0.20, 95% CI: -0.24, -0.17, p < 0.001); Latinx ($$B$$= -0.22, 95% CI: -0.27, -0.18, p < 0.001); Other ($$B$$= -0.19, 95% CI: -0.26, -0.11, p < 0.001)]. Compared to those identifying as Democrat, all other political affiliations had significantly lower mean scores. [Republican ($$B$$ =-0.49, 95% CI: -0.55, -0.43, p < 0.0001); Independent ($$B$$ =-0.29, 95% CI: -0.33, -0.25, p < 0.0001); something else ($$B$$ =-0.19, 95% CI: -0.25, -0.12, p < 0.0001)]. Having had COVID-19 ($$B$$= -0.10, 95% CI: -0.15, -0.06, p < 0.001) had significantly lower scores compared to those who did not have COVID-19. Conclusion Despite the setting of a major research University, trust in science is highly variable. This study identifies characteristics that could be used to target and curate educational campaigns and university policies to address the COVID19 and future pandemics.

Mental well-being and sleep quality among vocational college students in Sichuan, China during standardized COVID-19 management measures

“…Peer interactions constitute a vital aspect of the college experience, significantly impacting students’ mental health. Positive peer relationships can provide a sense of security, compensating for deficiencies in family and academic environments ( 51 ). Rust and support from peers can enhance students’ self-esteem and social skills, decreasing the likelihood of depression and anxiety.…”

“No One Asked Me If I’m Alright”: A Mixed-Methods Study Exploring Information/Support Needs and Challenges Engaging Men Diagnosed With Male-Factor Infertility

“…In addition, some research has suggested that active and direct approaches to engagement or recruitment, which “meet men where they are,” may be more successful ( Dolan et al, 2017 ; Pfitzner et al, 2018 ; Seidler et al, 2018 ), and our ethical approval only permitted passive recruitment strategies. The impact of COVID-19 and the subsequent public mistrust in the medical research sector ( Faasse & Newby, 2020 ; Nicolo et al, 2023 ) may have also contributed our low recruitment rates.…”

COVID‐19 pandemic's impact on the public's confidence in scientific community: The role of personal contact

“…Luna, Bering, and Halberstadt (2021), in an Mechanical Turk convenience sample, found that early on during the pandemic, faith in science increased but not trust. Nicolo et al (2023), in a study of students, faculty, and staff at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, found that conservatives were less trusting of science in response to the virus, but also that those who had contracted COVID-19 were also less likely to trust science. This diversity of findings on the impact of the pandemic on scientific trust/confidence suggests a need for results from a nationally representative sample.…”