2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10844-018-0537-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trust inference using implicit influence and projected user network for item recommendation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since they have different effects on the objective function, it is required to select two parameters to adjust their weights. Regularization [11], [16] coefficients are adopted to avoid excessive reliance on training data. As the F paradigm is a generally used regularization term, the loss function can describe as:…”
Section: Scmf Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since they have different effects on the objective function, it is required to select two parameters to adjust their weights. Regularization [11], [16] coefficients are adopted to avoid excessive reliance on training data. As the F paradigm is a generally used regularization term, the loss function can describe as:…”
Section: Scmf Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the shortest distance in our article is set to less than or equal to 3. The same strategy can be referred to in [4] and [41].…”
Section: A the Process Of The Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, in the real world, most social media websites do not provide users any way to explicitly express their trusts in each other, and therefore researchers have to design trust inference mechanisms based on the information containing trust relationships implicitly [11]. To the best of our knowledge, although trust-aware RS have been widely studied in recent years, there are still two problems to be resolved efficiently: (1) how to derive trust values from various social information; (2) how to integrate the data of trusts with user ratings [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%