The Philosophy of Trust 2017
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732549.003.0016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Trust is Basic’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nurse has to trust the patient and vice versa. Løgstrup argues that receiving trust from another motivates one to assume responsibility [ 37 ]. In the present results, this element is found in the sub-theme ‘Laying a foundation for a trusting relationship’.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nurse has to trust the patient and vice versa. Løgstrup argues that receiving trust from another motivates one to assume responsibility [ 37 ]. In the present results, this element is found in the sub-theme ‘Laying a foundation for a trusting relationship’.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One option to address this concern is by recognising that the dominant account of trust, based on 'mutual predictability' or 'reliability' might not be wholly suitable. Many philosophers have criticised this conception of trust as anaemic and offered more normatively thick conceptions of trust (Baier, 1986;Hollis, 1998;Faulkner, 2017;Stern, 2017). Adopting a less mechanistic account of trust will help us understand how an agent might trust a system like an ASE, even when it operates unpredictably and in ways that, temporarily at least, might make life more uncertain.…”
Section: Trust and Gluementioning
confidence: 99%