2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-017-0909-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Truth: explanation, success, and coincidence

Abstract: Inflationists have argued that truth is a causal-explanatory property on the grounds that true belief facilitates practical success: we must postulate truth to explain the practical success of certain actions performed by rational agents. Deflationists, however, have a seductive response. Rather than deny that true belief facilitates practical success, the deflationist maintains that the sole role for truth here is as a device for generalisation. In particular, each individual instance of practical success can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He then finds the hammer in one of the two places. To explain the fact that Charles successfully gets the hammer in one of the two places, one may appeal to his true belief that the 48 See Lynch (2009, pp.111-4) and Gamester (2018) for examples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He then finds the hammer in one of the two places. To explain the fact that Charles successfully gets the hammer in one of the two places, one may appeal to his true belief that the 48 See Lynch (2009, pp.111-4) and Gamester (2018) for examples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Though it is not clear to me that the view can be ascribed to all these authors.) Similarly, Will Gamester (2018) writes 'the deflationist has traditionally offered seductive individualised explanations that seem to leave no explanatory work for truth ' (p. 1264).…”
Section: The Deflationary Concept Of Truth and The Success Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12. Gamester (2018) discusses this sort of strategy at length and argues that it fails even if the substitution is granted. 13.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%