Trying to Return Home: A Trinidadian's Experience of Becoming a “Native” Ethnographer

Abstract

In this article, the author draws on the experiences of doing an ethnography of mas' making practices in Trinidad Carnival mas' camps to explore and dialogue with her perception of self as a becoming native ethnographer and her valuing of the perceptions of a member of the community's view of her role as another colonizer. She addresses the tensions between contestation, arrogant perceptions, and deep dialogue; the various forms of identification that informed the research process; and the various ways in which she positioned herself. She adapts and interprets some of the theoretical concepts she gained as a member of the community of educational researchers as she explores the challenges she faced as a native-born Trinidadian, educator, mas' player, and a becoming ethnographer.

Conducting community-engaged qualitative research in South Africa: memoirs of intersectional identities abroad

“…Research on intersectionality has historically benefited from the in-depth nature of qualitative inquiries (Bowleg, 2008; Wilkinson, 2003). However, only a select few studies have focused explicitly on the intersectional identities of researchers or the impact of their intersectional identities on the conduct of cross-cultural qualitative research in international settings (Fournillier, 2009; Turgo, 2012). Although more recent inquires have expanded the scope of intersectionality to capture not only the experiences of the oppressed, but in general, the multiple identities of all persons – be they privileged or discriminated (Christensen and Jensen, 2012,Yuval-Davis, 2011), most studies of the intersectional identities of researchers have relied on the binary ‘insider–outsider’ framework (Kanuha, 2000).…”

Working Within Hyphen-Spaces in Ethnographic Research

“…While active-neutrality means an often objectivist researcher remaining distant from respondent problems and issues, to an intersubjectivist researcher self-other relationships are entangled and identity work integral as all research participants influence and shape each others’ multiple and shifting identities. Spending 3 months in the field, and working from a subjectivist perspective, Geetha found herself intuitively and consciously working with multiple identities in her conversations with others: playing down being researcher, playing up being researcher (Lavis, 2010), being “native” or not (Fournillier, 2009; Kondo, 1986), figuring out what it means to be both the same and different. This often depended on where she was, to whom Geetha was talking, and what the conversation was about.…”

A ‘balikbayan’ in the field: scaling and (re)producing insider’s identity in a Philippine fishing community

“…Regardless of how researchers present themselves, participants interpret them as human beings in ways that make sense in their lives and in a manner that is not necessarily predictable (Guevarra, 2006: 529). Some good examples regarding the active agency of research participants fashioning the identity of researchers according to their own will including: Abu-Lughod (1986) as a dutiful daughter; Briggs (1970) as a prodigal daughter; Fournillier (2009) as the ‘American girl’ and the resident cleaner; Jordan (2006) as a student and a negative agent; Kuehnast (2000) as somebody who could open doors to the presumed riches of the West; Morales (1989) as a drug trafficker, a foreigner and a stranger; Shore (1999) as associate member of an Italian family; Venkatesh (2002) as a drug dealer and an ‘Arab’ child molester; among others. Effects on research of identity construction are well documented.…”