1996
DOI: 10.1016/0037-0738(95)00127-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tsunami-induced conglomerates in Miocene upper bathyal deposits, Chita Peninsula, central Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, tsunami action is reported as being responsible for the formation of large erosion surfaces in shallow marine environments, and for deposition in transitional environments (Shiki et al 2000). Marine deposition related to tsunami events is reported mainly in abyssal and bathyal environments (Kastens and Cita 1981;Shiki and Yamazaki 1996): all these sedimentary features are absent in the succession described in the present study.…”
Section: Origin Of the Soft-sediment Deformation Structuresmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In the literature, tsunami action is reported as being responsible for the formation of large erosion surfaces in shallow marine environments, and for deposition in transitional environments (Shiki et al 2000). Marine deposition related to tsunami events is reported mainly in abyssal and bathyal environments (Kastens and Cita 1981;Shiki and Yamazaki 1996): all these sedimentary features are absent in the succession described in the present study.…”
Section: Origin Of the Soft-sediment Deformation Structuresmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Following the mentioned tsunami events, numerous studies were carried out (Engel and Brückner 2011), mainly on the onshore effects (e.g., Engel and Brückner 2011;Spiske et al 2013), while offshore investigations, requiring ship cruises and coring, were far fewer in number (Dawson and Stewart 2007;Noda et al 2007;Sakuna et al 2012;Goto et al 2012;Fujiwara and Kamataki 2007;Ikehara et al 2014). On the other hand, most suspected tsunami deposits in the fossil record occur in marine shelf sediments, particularly isolated sandstone layers and enigmatic conglomerate beds (e.g., Shiki and Yamazaki 1996;Bussert and Aberhan 2004), which remain difficult to interpret without well-investigated present-day counterparts (Dawson and Stewart 2007). This also applies to the Monotis-Dactylioceras Bed of the Posidonienschiefer Formation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…According to Shiki and Yamazaki (1996), the term 'tsunamite' should be used broadly, not only for the deposits laid down by the oncoming tsunami wave itself, but also for all of the other sediments connected with the resulting backwash flow, currents, mass gravity movements etc. This leads to a "Nomenclature overlap" (Shanmugam 2006) -a situation, in which the same deposit can be properly named in different ways, as various genetic definitions refer to different moments of the sedimentary process.…”
Section: Introduction -Palaeotsunami Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%