2012
DOI: 10.18637/jss.v052.i11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

runmlwin: A Program to Run theMLwiNMultilevel Modeling Software from withinStata

Abstract: We illustrate how to fit multilevel models in the MLwiN package seamlessly from within Stata using the Stata program runmlwin. We argue that using MLwiN and Stata in combination allows researchers to capitalize on the best features of both packages. We provide examples of how to use runmlwin to fit continuous, binary, ordinal, nominal and mixed response multilevel models by both maximum likelihood and Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
306
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(317 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(6 reference statements)
2
306
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 95% CrI can thus be interpreted as the interval within which there is a 95% chance the true population values are included. All analyses were conducted using MLWin Version 2.1 (Browne, 2009;Rasbash et al, 2009) and Stata 14 (College Station, TX) with the RunMlWin add-on package (Leckie et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 95% CrI can thus be interpreted as the interval within which there is a 95% chance the true population values are included. All analyses were conducted using MLWin Version 2.1 (Browne, 2009;Rasbash et al, 2009) and Stata 14 (College Station, TX) with the RunMlWin add-on package (Leckie et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependent variables were generated with trends and residuals 14 as specified by the DGPs in Table 1. The data were generated in Stata, and the models were estimated using MCMC 15 Gibbs sampling in MLwiN v2.25 (Rasbash et al 2013) with the runmlwin (Leckie and Charlton 2013) (Brooks and Gelman 1998;Gelman and Rubin 1992). The original version of this compares the variance of five different chains (from five different starting values) compared to the variance of the pooling of all five of these chains.…”
Section: Simulation Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulations were conducted in a similar way to those in Bell and Jones (2013a), using Bayesian MCMC methods (Browne, 2009) in MLwiN version 2.28 (Rasbash et al, 2013), through Stata using the runmlwin command (Leckie & Charlton, 2013). True values from the DGP were used as starting values as non-informative priors, and the model was run for 20,000 iterations, following a 1000 iteration burn-in.…”
Section: Simulation Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%