1983
DOI: 10.1016/0036-9748(83)90334-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TTT curves for the formation of austenite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This point is currently under investigation. The enthalpy change associated with the α → γ transformation in aged samples is slightly less than the corresponding value recorded for pure iron, and this is certainly due to the presence of the carbide phase that serves to retard the kinetics of the α → γ structural change [28]. In the case of the martensite, the carbide volume fraction formed during continuous heating being relatively less, the α → γ structure change is facilitated to a little more extent with the concomitant effect of recording a slightly higher value for enthalpy change (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This point is currently under investigation. The enthalpy change associated with the α → γ transformation in aged samples is slightly less than the corresponding value recorded for pure iron, and this is certainly due to the presence of the carbide phase that serves to retard the kinetics of the α → γ structural change [28]. In the case of the martensite, the carbide volume fraction formed during continuous heating being relatively less, the α → γ structure change is facilitated to a little more extent with the concomitant effect of recording a slightly higher value for enthalpy change (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The determination of the calibration factor (J · µV −1 · s −1 ) for converting the peak area into appropriate enthalpy units is enabled from a knowledge of the known value of the enthalpy associated with similar phase changes taking place in pure iron and the corresponding peak area-all measured under identical experimental conditions. It is reasonable to assume in the case of pure iron that for a heating rate of about 10 K · min −1 , the α → γ allotropic transformation goes to near completion; but in the case of high chromium steels, the presence of carbides and its sluggish dissolution in austenite, results in an incomplete realization of the α → γ transformation at the transformation off-set Ac 3 temperature [21,28,29]. Because of this fact, there is a mild underestimation of the true enthalpy change that is associated with austenite formation reaction under equilibrium conditions.…”
Section: Principal Transformation Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we may infer from Fig. 9 that the process of isothermal austenitisation involves certain well defied time dependent microstructural changes, such as carbide dissolution [92,93], which as the present experimental results suggest, is progressive in nature. Depending on the homogeneity of the starting microstructure at sub-micron level, the carbide dissolution process gets initiated at different time intervals.…”
Section: Carbide Dissolution In Austenite and Its Effect On Martensitmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This is subsequently followed by a continuous decrease in a manner that is much like the case of 1323 K austenitised samples. Obviously, this difference in the initial response of the hardness curve between these two annealing temperatures stems from the sluggish nature of carbide dissolution step at 1253 K [92,93]. For smaller time holds at 1253 K, the parent austenite phase still contains quite an extent of undissolved carbides as compared to 1323 K. Further, the lack of carbide dissolution means that the austenite is not getting that much enriched in chromium which is a known ferrite stabiliser.…”
Section: Carbide Dissolution In Austenite and Its Effect On Martensitmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, another feature shown in Figure 8 is that a longer time is required to increase the austenite volume fraction by 5% at a later stage of the transformation, which reveals the impingement mechanism in the steel. As described by Lenel (1983), towards the end of the reaction when a large amount of austenite has been formed, impingement of neighbouring growth centres (or their diffusion fields) will occur, which slows down the reaction rate and increases the time taken to reach equilibrium. Figure 8 Effect of heating rate on the transformation time to increase austenite volume fraction by 5% from 80%, 85% and 90% during soaking at 1173K.…”
Section: Effects Of Heating Rate On Isothermal Austenite Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%