2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tu1412 The Impact of Colonoscopy Preparation on Recommended Colonoscopy Screening Intervals in Average-Risk Screening Patients With No Polyps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When excellent/good bowel cleansing is compared to fair bowel cleansing, excellent/good bowel cleansing is associated with higher polyp detection rates and greater likelihood of being appropriately instructed to repeat colonoscopy at 10-year intervals after a normal screening colonoscopy(5, 12). Secondary endpoints compared MiraLAX® + Gatorade + bisacodyl-treated patients to patients treated with 4L GoLytely® for: (a) comparison of frequency of excellent, good, fair, and poor bowel cleansing; (b) frequency of receiving a recommendation to repeat colonoscopy at 10-year intervals after a normal screening colonoscopy; and (c) frequency of serious adverse events.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When excellent/good bowel cleansing is compared to fair bowel cleansing, excellent/good bowel cleansing is associated with higher polyp detection rates and greater likelihood of being appropriately instructed to repeat colonoscopy at 10-year intervals after a normal screening colonoscopy(5, 12). Secondary endpoints compared MiraLAX® + Gatorade + bisacodyl-treated patients to patients treated with 4L GoLytely® for: (a) comparison of frequency of excellent, good, fair, and poor bowel cleansing; (b) frequency of receiving a recommendation to repeat colonoscopy at 10-year intervals after a normal screening colonoscopy; and (c) frequency of serious adverse events.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%