2023
DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TUBectomy with delayed oophorectomy as an alternative to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk women to assess the safety of prevention: the TUBA-WISP II study protocol

Abstract: BackgroundRisk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy has gained interest for individuals at high risk for tubo-ovarian cancer as there is compelling evidence that especially high-grade serous carcinoma originates in the fallopian tubes. Two studies have demonstrated a positive effect of salpingectomy on menopause-related quality of life and sexual health compared with standard risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.Primary ObjectiveTo investigate whether salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy is non-i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ongoing trials related to this are described in Table 2 . However, salpingectomy alone or ISDO should not be recommended outside clinical trials, and RRSO remains the treatment of choice for EOC prevention [ 97 , 98 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ongoing trials related to this are described in Table 2 . However, salpingectomy alone or ISDO should not be recommended outside clinical trials, and RRSO remains the treatment of choice for EOC prevention [ 97 , 98 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy has gained interest for women at high risk for tubo-ovarian cancer, as there is compelling evidence that especially high-grade serous carcinoma originates in the fallopian tubes [77], but it is not recommended outside of a clinical trial setting [4].…”
Section: Surgical Strategies For Primary Prevention Of Bcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy can be considered in women who have completed pregnancy and who are carriers of PALB2 PGVs at an age > 45 years, of RAD51C and RAD51D PGVs at the age of 45-50 years, of NF1 PGVs at an age > 45 years, and BRIP1 PGVs from 45 to 50 years of age [12]. CHEK2, NBN, PTEN, MSH6, and PMS2 PGVs are not associated with the risk of ovarian cancer; therefore, bilateral prophylactic salpingectomy is not indicated [12,[77][78][79][80].…”
Section: Surgical Strategies For Primary Prevention Of Bcmentioning
confidence: 99%