2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuber respiratory profiles during low temperature sweetening (LTS) and reconditioning of LTS-resistant and susceptible potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, lowering the O 2 concentration from 21 kPa to 2.5 kPa greatly reduced tuber respiration, which fell even further when the temperature was lowered from 8 to Here we demonstrate that O 2 concentration greatly affected the kinetics of the cold-induced RARs (averaged over cultivars). When assessed as percent increase in respiration from trough to peak (Zommick et al 2014b), the RAR for tubers at 2.5 kPa O 2 was 17% compared with only 7% for tubers at 21 kPa O 2 where the buildup in total sugar concentration (RS + Suc) was greatest. Low O 2 , however, slowed development of the RAR relative to tubers stored at 21 kPa O 2 , which likely reflects the limited availability of substrate (O 2 ) and need for energy to fuel the attenuated sweetening metabolism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As expected, lowering the O 2 concentration from 21 kPa to 2.5 kPa greatly reduced tuber respiration, which fell even further when the temperature was lowered from 8 to Here we demonstrate that O 2 concentration greatly affected the kinetics of the cold-induced RARs (averaged over cultivars). When assessed as percent increase in respiration from trough to peak (Zommick et al 2014b), the RAR for tubers at 2.5 kPa O 2 was 17% compared with only 7% for tubers at 21 kPa O 2 where the buildup in total sugar concentration (RS + Suc) was greatest. Low O 2 , however, slowed development of the RAR relative to tubers stored at 21 kPa O 2 , which likely reflects the limited availability of substrate (O 2 ) and need for energy to fuel the attenuated sweetening metabolism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tuber respiration rates were monitored to determine the effects of O 2 concentration on the initial respiratory acclimation responses (RAR) to decreasing temperature (8 to 4 o C) and as an indicator of changes in metabolic rate over 155 d of cold-sweetening. The outlet atmosphere from two of the 212-d, 21 and 2.5 kPa O 2 chambers was directed through an LI-6262 infrared CO 2 gas analyzer (LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NB, USA) as described previously (Zommick et al 2014b). Carbon dioxide concentrations were quantified at 2.5-h intervals through the initial 8-d acclimation period at 8 o C and continuing through 155 d of storage at 4 o C. Tuber respiration rates (CO 2 evolution) are reported as µg kg -1 s -1 .…”
Section: Whole Tuber Respirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Potato tubers during the late stage of storage will undergo a developmentally controlled, age-dependent shift in metabolism that results in an accumulation of sugars such as sucrose and glucose, a process that is called senescent sweetening [43]. The most widely accepted hypothesis for the mechanism of senescent sweetening is that tuber tissue senescence after a certain period of time in storage including the breakdown of the cell membrane, can facilitate enzyme access to starch granules and speed up starch conversion to sugars [44], which then results in unacceptable darkening of finished fries in a chemical process called the Maillard reaction [45]. Varieties that are most susceptible to senescent sweetening tend to have shorter dormancy.…”
Section: Senescent Sweetening Of Snowden Was Ameliorated Under Highermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following 16-hour humidification treatment, GLA-treated and control pears were weighed and sealed into continuous air flow chambers (four replicates of 4 fruit per replicate), which sample CO 2 at 4-hour intervals. Fruit respiration rates were determined by calculating mean CO 2 evolution per kilogram of fruit at each sample time using the previously described methods and sampling system [57].…”
Section: Monitoring Of Carbon Dioxide Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%