Around the world currently, over 70 million people are forcibly displaced, most trying to escape war, persecution, disaster, drought, and/or famine (UNHCR 2019). In this paper, we pick up on the arguments that (a) the existing international apparatus concerning displaced people, such as asylum-seekers, has contributed to the creation of the new norm of chronic, insecure containment; (b) this state of affairs should be understood through the lens of structural injustice (Parekh 2016;Schiff 2018); and (c) we thus have responsibilities of justice to asylum-seekers and other migrants in the immediate and long term. Drawing on Iris M. Young's (2000) account of the structural injustice of segregation, work by Hannah Arendt, Serena Parekh, and Kelly Oliver on the plight of refugees and asylum-seekers, and the anthropological research of Michel Agier and others on camp settings and informal settlements, here, we add to the understanding of the injustice of chronic displacement and encampment (and the like) and offer a partial remedy. We argue that prevailing conditions: contribute to a loss of political community and identity; radically threaten agency and equal opportunity; and obscure privilege from the privileged. We further maintain that structural injustice in this context involves the moral experience of a loss of place and, then, implacement in inhospitable, deprived, and depraved environs for protracted periods. More responsible, more just, policy and planning around displacement should organize around a conception of people as ecological subjects. We describe these responsibilities in terms of the ideal and practice of ethical placemaking, an essential element of an enabling, or capabilities-oriented, conception of justice (Eckenwiler , 2016). Grounded in an ecological conception of persons, ethical placemaking (EPM) sees people as embedded socially and spatially, and enmeshed in structural injustice. It takes account of the ways in which asylum-seekers and others enduring longterm displacement are situated in asymmetrical social, political, and economic structures and relations of power that have contributed to their being uprooted, and that make the current conditions in which they dwell not just unsustainable, but also hostile. Constructively, it facilitates the formulation of an account of what ecological subjects generally and refugees particularly need to flourish and to be treated fairly as they await settlement (and eventually within a new given society)-a process from which all benefit on our account. Presented here as a remedial responsibility, EPM has the potential
| 235ECKENWILER aNd WILd to mitigate some of the harms of encampment and, at the same time, serve as a catalyst in advancing global structural justice. From the perspective of policy making around refugee reception and resettlement, ethical placemaking should serve as a guiding ideal and a principle for the policies and practices of international institutions, states, local government, and civil society.
| THE SYSTEMS FOR ASYLUM, REFUGEE MA...