2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuberculosis Infection in the United States: Prevalence Estimates from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011-2012

Abstract: BackgroundReexamining the prevalence of persons infected with tuberculosis (TB) is important to determine trends over time. In 2011–2012 a TB component was included in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to estimate the reservoir of persons infected with TB.MethodsCivilian, noninstitutionalized U.S. population survey participants aged 6 years and older were interviewed regarding their TB history and eligibility for the tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon gamma release assay (IGR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
128
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
128
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For the foreign-born population, LTBI prevalence estimates were 20.3% if defined as TST positive, 16.3% if defined as QFT positive, and 9.1% if defined as both tests positive (Table 3). These estimates based on TST alone are similar to previous estimates for U.S. adults and a recently published study of the 2011-2012 NHANES sample (15,24,25).…”
Section: Baseline Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the foreign-born population, LTBI prevalence estimates were 20.3% if defined as TST positive, 16.3% if defined as QFT positive, and 9.1% if defined as both tests positive (Table 3). These estimates based on TST alone are similar to previous estimates for U.S. adults and a recently published study of the 2011-2012 NHANES sample (15,24,25).…”
Section: Baseline Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Finally, our use of a 10-mm threshold for defining a positive TST would not comply with current U.S. guidelines (2) for U.S.-born individuals, which recommend use of a 15-mm cutoff in persons not known to be at increased risk for TB infection, and may have increased the false positivity rate. We chose this cutoff on the basis of prior population-based studies (12,15,21,24,25) and evaluated different TST cut-points in U.S.-and foreign-born populations. In general, LTBI testing should be targeted to individuals at high risk for LTBI and/or progression to active TB.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NHANES survey methodology has been previously described in detail [4,11]. In brief, NHANES is an ongoing series of cross-sectional health examination surveys conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) designed to assess the health and nutritional status of U.S. residents.…”
Section: Study Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brief, NHANES is an ongoing series of cross-sectional health examination surveys conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) designed to assess the health and nutritional status of U.S. residents. Every year, approximately 5,000 non-institutionalized civilian U.S. residents of all ages complete detailed health interviews in their homes, and complete a comprehensive physical health examination in a mobile examination center [4,11]. Although each survey year represents a nationally representative sample, data are released in 2-year cycles to ensure adequate sample size and protect confidentiality.…”
Section: Study Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy identifies and treats prevalent cases but does not address the people with existing infections who are at risk for reactivation disease. Although the United States maintains a national surveillance program for tuberculosis disease, it does not have a parallel program for surveillance of latent infection, and so must rely on contact investigations and periodic surveys to measure latent infection (4).…”
Section: Why Prevention Mattersmentioning
confidence: 99%