1969
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800560408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tubes for gastric aspiration after vagotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

1972
1972
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A gastrostomy is an additional operation, though a small one. A further objection is that infection of the gastrostomy wound may occur, though we have not found this important, and it has not increased the incidence of infection in the main abdominal wound, as Hamer et al (1969) found. The advantages of a gastrostomy are that it is more comfortable for the patient (Miller et al, 1972), it causes no laryngeal or oesophageal complications and the tube can be allowed to drain freely into a bag, thus keeping the stomach empty of fluid and swallowed air, and if a Foley catheter is used there is no doubt that the tip of the tube is in the stomach.…”
contrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A gastrostomy is an additional operation, though a small one. A further objection is that infection of the gastrostomy wound may occur, though we have not found this important, and it has not increased the incidence of infection in the main abdominal wound, as Hamer et al (1969) found. The advantages of a gastrostomy are that it is more comfortable for the patient (Miller et al, 1972), it causes no laryngeal or oesophageal complications and the tube can be allowed to drain freely into a bag, thus keeping the stomach empty of fluid and swallowed air, and if a Foley catheter is used there is no doubt that the tip of the tube is in the stomach.…”
contrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Paralytic ileus lasting for more than 4 days was recorded as a complication, and evidence of graft infection was sought. Wound infection, dehiscence and later incisional hernia were noted and, in view of the findings of Hamer et al (1969), the incidence of venous thrombo-embolism and dysphagia. The incidence of these complications in gastrostomy and nasogastric patients was compared, as was the mean time spent by each group between operation and discharge from hospital.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%