2014
DOI: 10.4187/respcare.03454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tubing Length for Long-Term Oxygen Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The cause of discontinuation was discomfort with OT, such as a dry mouth or nose. The number and types of local adverse effects were similar to those reported in previous studies, despite large differences in populations concerning underlying respiratory diseases, medical insurance coverage, and equipment types [ 18 - 20 ]. These adverse effects are often neglected or left untreated by physicians [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The cause of discontinuation was discomfort with OT, such as a dry mouth or nose. The number and types of local adverse effects were similar to those reported in previous studies, despite large differences in populations concerning underlying respiratory diseases, medical insurance coverage, and equipment types [ 18 - 20 ]. These adverse effects are often neglected or left untreated by physicians [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…36 In addition to this hypothesis, it is reported that inadequate guidance to these patients on oxygen tubing length may negatively influence their PADL and quality of life. 37 Many companies eventually restrict tubing length at short distances because they mistakenly believe that this can affect the flow of oxygen which contributes to the reduction of the mobility of these patients. Aguiar et al 37 verified that a length of 30 m does not alter the flow and fractions of inspired oxygen supplied, and it may provide greater freedom for patients to move around at home.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Many companies eventually restrict tubing length at short distances because they mistakenly believe that this can affect the flow of oxygen which contributes to the reduction of the mobility of these patients. Aguiar et al 37 verified that a length of 30 m does not alter the flow and fractions of inspired oxygen supplied, and it may provide greater freedom for patients to move around at home. In this study, we observed that the mean tubing length was 9.5 m, which may had a direct influence on the low level of PADL in subjects in the home oxygen therapy group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Aguiar et al). (162) J Bras Pneumol. 2022;48(5):e20220179 7/22 na capacidade de exercício e na qualidade de vida.…”
Section: Hpunclassified