2015
DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2013.798664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tucker3 Model for Compositional Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A particular version of the Tucker models for CoDa was proposed to analyze the chemical composition of surficial waters pertaining to the Arno river. Gallo () has shown how it is possible to apply the Tucker3 model for CoDa by discussing the results obtained when different kinds of preprocessing are used. Here, this approach was proposed for wPCA model, and a full interpretation of the results is given.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A particular version of the Tucker models for CoDa was proposed to analyze the chemical composition of surficial waters pertaining to the Arno river. Gallo () has shown how it is possible to apply the Tucker3 model for CoDa by discussing the results obtained when different kinds of preprocessing are used. Here, this approach was proposed for wPCA model, and a full interpretation of the results is given.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is easy to verify that these constraints are automatically respected. Gallo (2012a) has shown that the loadings matrices of clr, plr, and ilr transformed data are strongly linked. In detail, the loadings matrices for the first and third modes are equivalent for the three transformations.…”
Section: The Tucker3 Model For Compositional Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tucker3 is another multivariate deconvolution method for higher-order data also known as "3-way principal component analysis (PCA)" [25]. It decomposes the three-way data as follows [9]:…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both PARAFAC and Tucker3 decompose the three-way data into factors containing scores (information pertaining to the sample's variability) and two different loadings, one for the 1 st mode (e.g., emission) and another for the 2 nd mode (e.g., excitation) profiles [6,8]. The difference between these techniques is that 4 the Tucker3 method also generates a core array containing the scores and loadings weights for each factor generated [7][8][9]. Both PARAFAC and Tucker3 significantly reduce the dataset, speeding up computational processing time, solving problems of ill-conditioned data and removing interference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%