1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7757(96)00079-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuition and financial aid in higher education: The case of California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Important issues of the economics of HE are couched in quite different terms: how to evaluate the human capital that is produced through investments in HE; how to trace productivity improvements that justify public investment in HE, and how to assess the role of HE as a sorting, filtering and signalling mechanism (Balderston, 1997).…”
Section: Educational Management Administration and Leadership 32(2)supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Important issues of the economics of HE are couched in quite different terms: how to evaluate the human capital that is produced through investments in HE; how to trace productivity improvements that justify public investment in HE, and how to assess the role of HE as a sorting, filtering and signalling mechanism (Balderston, 1997).…”
Section: Educational Management Administration and Leadership 32(2)supporting
confidence: 81%
“…This positive impact of financial aid on enrollment seems quite intuitive as financial aid softens the burden of the high cost of college (Balderston, 1997).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The qualitative conclusions are also robust to changes in the HOPE program that occurred during the sample period. For example, after netting out variation in average enrollments (or award values) across years or across institutions with the inclusion of year and institution fixed effects, our reported specifications implicitly restrict the effect of HOPE in 1993and 1994to equal that in 1995, 1996, and 1997 to Pell enrollments, one should not anticipate significant implications of the 1995 income cap removal, since this pertained only to nonneedy students who, with or without the requirement to file, would not receive Pell assistance (e.g., the National Center for Education Statistics, table 414, 1998, reports that 90% of student participants in the two largest federal aid programs, the Stafford loan and the Pell grant, have family incomes below $40,000). Further, with data on Pell enrollments not available by class within institutions (i.e., freshman, sophomore, etc.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Enrollment Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, despite the size of the Pell program and the significant changes in the environment facing needy students targeted by Pell resources, prior research has noted a paucity of formal evidence associated with how the movement toward non-need-based aid has affected their access to a college education (e.g., Balderston 1997;Clotfelter 2004). While not measuring need directly, prior work has shown that the impact of merit aid in Georgia appears larger among relatively higher income groups and among institutions that attract relatively well-to-do students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%