2018
DOI: 10.1111/cas.13476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor‐associated CD204+ M2 macrophages are unfavorable prognostic indicators in uterine cervical adenocarcinoma

Abstract: Uterine cervical adenocarcinoma is rare, but its prevalence has increased. To improve outcomes and ensure the suitability of recent immunotherapies, the aim of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathological impact of the tumor immune microenvironment of uterine cervical adenocarcinoma. We investigated 148 adenocarcinoma cases, including 21 cases of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and 127 cases of invasive adenocarcinoma, using immunohistochemistry to detect tumor‐infiltrating immune cells and the expression o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
77
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, this study is the first report demonstrating the prognostic effect of the ratios of CD8 + /CD204 + and CD20 + /CD204 + tumor‐infiltrating cells and their significant association with the overall DFS. The significance of the ratio of CD8 + /CD204 + TIIC has also been reported in esophageal carcinoma and uterine cervical adenocarcinoma 48,49 . Compared to the single immune cells, their ratios were found to be consistent among regions (tumor islets and stroma) and values (maximum, mean and median) in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…To our knowledge, this study is the first report demonstrating the prognostic effect of the ratios of CD8 + /CD204 + and CD20 + /CD204 + tumor‐infiltrating cells and their significant association with the overall DFS. The significance of the ratio of CD8 + /CD204 + TIIC has also been reported in esophageal carcinoma and uterine cervical adenocarcinoma 48,49 . Compared to the single immune cells, their ratios were found to be consistent among regions (tumor islets and stroma) and values (maximum, mean and median) in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These two results contradict the common view of tumor-promoting M2 macrophages and tumor-suppressing M1 macrophages. In many cancer types, M2 macrophage counts are associated with adverse outcomes Jensen et al, 2009;Kawachi et al, 2018;Medrek et al, 2012), and M1 macrophage infiltration is correlated with better prognosis (Ma et al, 2010;Mei et al, 2016). However, several studies suggest that the dichotomous M1/M2 classification of macrophages is oversimplified, and the role of tumor-associated macrophages is still controversial (Martinez and Gordon, 2014;Van Overmeire et al, 2014).…”
Section: Correlation Of the Immune Cells With Mdnasimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is discovered that a large number of monocyte lymphocytes infiltrate cervical cancer tissues, but they are still unable to prevent the metastasis of cancer cells, indicating that cancer cells have the ability to escape immunological surveillance [28]. CD3 þ CD56 þ NKT cells are a kind of natural immune cells with strong heterogeneity [29]. They directly recognize and kill tumour cells, play a role of immune regulation by secreting Th1 or Th2 cytokines and have potential clinical application value in cancer treatment [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%