“…Our observation was corroborated by repeating the measurements using the same IgG4-specific secondary antibody as well as by using the same clone from an alternative source (including differences in concentrations and storage buffers), which makes us confident that the results presented are valid. Moreover, we presented one of the most comprehensive cross-validations to date of all secondary antibodies -widely used in research on SARS-CoV-2 (Crowley et al, 2021;Fraley et al, 2021;Kim et al, 2021;Lee et al, 2021;Newell et al, 2021;Phelan et al, 2021;Pullen et al, 2021;Yates et al, 2021) and in other fields (Minassian et al, 2021;Sanchez Vargas et al, 2021;Tschismarov et al, 2021;Jennewein et al, 2022;Toney et al, 2022) -employed in this study and have confirmed their specificity to their target. We have noted that the sensitivity of the anti-human IgG1 antibody used can benefit from a higher concentration; however, it would come at a cost of compromising its specificity as the antibody shows cross-reactivity to other IgG subtypes at slightly increased concentrations, therefore, presenting a less favorable sensitivity-to-specificity profile than the other secondary antibodies.…”