2015
DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000000504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor Budding in Colorectal Carcinoma

Abstract: Tumor budding in colorectal carcinoma has been associated with poor outcome in multiple studies, but the absence of an established histologic cutoff for “high” tumor budding, heterogeneity in study populations and varying methods for assessing tumor budding have hindered widespread incorporation of this parameter in clinical reports. We used an established scoring system in a population-based cohort to determine a histologic cutoff for “high” tumor budding and confirm its prognostic significance. We retrieved … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, miRNA-148a expression was lower in cancers with tumor budding (median values accordingly 0.314 and 0.753, p = 0.011), which has been found by other studies to be associated with a more invasive phenotype and distant metastases [ 40 ] and determined as prognostic factor independent from CRC stage [ 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, miRNA-148a expression was lower in cancers with tumor budding (median values accordingly 0.314 and 0.753, p = 0.011), which has been found by other studies to be associated with a more invasive phenotype and distant metastases [ 40 ] and determined as prognostic factor independent from CRC stage [ 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Only a few tumor markers (RAS and BRAF mutation, mismatch repair status) have been implemented into clinical practice [ 2 , 3 ]. Recent evidence suggests, that tumor budding, described as the presence of individual cells and small clusters of tumor cells at the invasive front of the carcinoma, could serve as an additional prognostic factor in stage II CRC [ 4 , 5 ], but there is little information regarding its significance in the advanced disease. The down-regulation of epithelial and the up-regulation of mesenchymal markers suggests that tumor budding is a morphological expression of epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), which is associated with tumor invasiveness, formation of metastases and resistance to chemotherapy [ 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HTB has been demonstrated to independently affect disease-free survival and overall survival in colorectal cancers [12, 32], lung carcinomas [18, 19], and esophageal squamous cell carcinomas [13]. Moreover, HTB may serve as an additional prognostic factor to identify patients with stage I/II colorectal carcinoma at risk of recurrence following curative surgery [33, 34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphologically, tumor budding is defined as the presence of single tumor cells or isolated small clusters of tumor cells (up to 5 tumor cells) scattered in the stroma at the invasive front; it represents a type of local diffusely infiltrative growth and occurs when tumor cells detach from the invasive tumor margin and migrate into the surrounding stroma. Tumor budding has frequently been observed in several types of solid tumors, including colorectal cancer [12], esophageal carcinoma [13], pancreatic carcinoma [14, 15], breast cancer [16, 17], lung carcinoma [18, 19], and endometrial carcinoma [20]; tumor budding has been recognized as an aggressive indicator and an adverse prognostic factor [1220]. Moreover, as a result of its significant prognostic value, tumor budding is recommended by the International Union against Cancer for inclusion in the pathological report of colorectal cancer as an additional prognostic factor [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumor budding in CRC has been associated with poor disease outcomes in various studies (28). We divided our cohort into three groups based on tumor budding data; low (PBMC; n = 13, NILs/TILs; n = 11), intermediate (PBMC; n = 11, NILs/TILs; n = 7) and high (PBMC; n = 10, NILs/TILs; n = 9), and compared levels of various T cell subsets in circulation, NILs and TILs between them.…”
Section: Levels Of Cd4 + T Cells Are Similar In Patients Exhibiting Vmentioning
confidence: 99%