2012
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2012.2211887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor Burden Analysis on Computed Tomography by Automated Liver and Tumor Segmentation

Abstract: The paper presents the automated computation of hepatic tumor burden from abdominal CT images of diseased populations with images with inconsistent enhancement. The automated segmentation of livers is addressed first. A novel three-dimensional (3D) affine invariant shape parameterization is employed to compare local shape across organs. By generating a regular sampling of the organ's surface, this parameterization can be effectively used to compare features of a set of closed 3D surfaces point-to-point, while … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the threshold-based method is likely to require re-definition of the set thresholds for each tumor type, automatic selection of clusters could possibly also be performed on the basis of features more specific to tumors in general, for example shape, size [18], and tissue homogeneity [9]. Recently, Linguraru et al [34] showed that liver tumors can be accurately detected on contrastenhanced computed tomography images by using a set of features that describe the intensity, shape, size, and homogeneity of identified objects of interest in the liver. Apart from their potential utility for cluster selection, such tumor features could also be used to select the tumor volume from the results from morphological component analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the threshold-based method is likely to require re-definition of the set thresholds for each tumor type, automatic selection of clusters could possibly also be performed on the basis of features more specific to tumors in general, for example shape, size [18], and tissue homogeneity [9]. Recently, Linguraru et al [34] showed that liver tumors can be accurately detected on contrastenhanced computed tomography images by using a set of features that describe the intensity, shape, size, and homogeneity of identified objects of interest in the liver. Apart from their potential utility for cluster selection, such tumor features could also be used to select the tumor volume from the results from morphological component analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the features extracted are carefully chosen it is expected that the features set will extract the relevant information from the input data in order to perform the desired task using this reduced representation instead of the full size input [5], [12].…”
Section: 5feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Casciaro et al [82] published a method that could achieve TPR=92.3% (no information about FPC).  The evaluation of the method presented by Linguraru et al [83] demonstrated TPR=100% with FPC=2.3.  The paper of Wu et al [84] demonstrated TPR=90% with FPC=2.6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition to the main cancer types the detection and segmentation of brain pathologies [66] in MR images [67], lymph nodes in CT images [68], and liver tumours in CT or MR images were also focused on in many publications. The three main motivations for liver lesion detection are lesion classification [51, 69-73, 88, 90], lesion segmentation and quantification [75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85]89], and follow-up [86]. The following paragraphs summarize the recent methods and results related to liver lesion detection.…”
Section: Liver Lesion Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation