1999
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.135.10.1204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor Burden Index as a Prognostic Tool for Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

Abstract: To introduce a prognostic tool for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma that takes into account the tumor burden and to compare the prognostic value of this tumor burden index (TBI) with that of other prognostic factors. Design: Retrospective clinical and statistical study. Patients: One hundred sixteen patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Methods: A TBI was designed that takes into account the types, numbers, and severity of skin lesions with the use of the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: Models of the TBI w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Others [13][14][15][16] have described a tumor burden index (TBI) for MF that is based on a retrospectively derived equation, the most recent being: TBI = 1 + (patches ϫ 2) + (plaquesϫ2)+(tumorsϫ1.3), where the factor for patches equals zero if there is 30% or less TBSA patch involvement, 1 if greater than 30% TBSA, 1 if plaques or tumors are present, and 0 if absent. Based on the most recent report, 6 possible TBI scores exist (1, 2.3, 3, 4.3, 5, and 6.3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Others [13][14][15][16] have described a tumor burden index (TBI) for MF that is based on a retrospectively derived equation, the most recent being: TBI = 1 + (patches ϫ 2) + (plaquesϫ2)+(tumorsϫ1.3), where the factor for patches equals zero if there is 30% or less TBSA patch involvement, 1 if greater than 30% TBSA, 1 if plaques or tumors are present, and 0 if absent. Based on the most recent report, 6 possible TBI scores exist (1, 2.3, 3, 4.3, 5, and 6.3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 However, more recently, this group suggests the TBI to be most useful as a prognostic tool for individual patients at the time of presentation. 16 This score could then help guide treatment strategies based on their survival expectancy. The authors further point out that the TBI cannot be used to monitor changes in a patient's disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients were staged clinically according to the Ann Arbor system, 16 except for cases with skin tumors, which were staged according to the TNM staging of cutaneous TCL. 23 Survival was analyzed as a function of time from histologic diagnosis to the last date of follow-up in December 2002, using Kaplan-Meier product limit method. The upper aerodigestive tract included nasal, paranasal sinuses, nasopharynx, pharynx, oral cavity, hypopharynx and tonsillar regions.…”
Section: Clinical Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] These factors include basic demographic factors, the extent and type of skin involvement, the presence of extracutaneous disease, lymphadenopathy, and peripheral blood involvement. [14][15][16][17] Other potential prognostic factors that have been studied include large-cell transformation, 18 philia, levels of serum interleukin 2 receptor 20 and tumorinfiltrating T cells, 21 expressions of cytokines and adhesion molecules, histological variables, 22 tumor burden index, 23 thickness of cutaneous infiltrate, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, B symptoms, and clinical response to therapy. Despite these reports, long-term follow-up studies of large groups of patients with MF and SS are limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%