2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2005.00050.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor immunity against adult T‐cell leukemia

Abstract: Human T-cell leukemia virus type-I (HTLV-I) causes adult T-cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
43
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(66 reference statements)
1
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The proviral load of Tax [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] tetramer-positive AC was significantly lower than that of Tax [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] tetramer-negative AC (mean Ϯ SE, 38.1 Ϯ 13.8 vs 74.8 Ϯ 8.0; p ϭ 0.043; Table IV). These findings are consistent with Bangham's report (47) and suggest that Tax [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] CTL works as a strong down-regulator of the proviral load. In contrast, with regard to Tax 301-309 tetramer, there was no significant difference between the proviral load of Tax 301-309 tetramer-positive AC and negative AC (mean Ϯ SE, 72.4 Ϯ 9.4 vs 53.5 Ϯ 11.6; Table IV).…”
Section: Htlv-1 Proviral Load In Ac and Atl Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The proviral load of Tax [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] tetramer-positive AC was significantly lower than that of Tax [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] tetramer-negative AC (mean Ϯ SE, 38.1 Ϯ 13.8 vs 74.8 Ϯ 8.0; p ϭ 0.043; Table IV). These findings are consistent with Bangham's report (47) and suggest that Tax [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] CTL works as a strong down-regulator of the proviral load. In contrast, with regard to Tax 301-309 tetramer, there was no significant difference between the proviral load of Tax 301-309 tetramer-positive AC and negative AC (mean Ϯ SE, 72.4 Ϯ 9.4 vs 53.5 Ϯ 11.6; Table IV).…”
Section: Htlv-1 Proviral Load In Ac and Atl Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, with regard to Tax 301-309 tetramer, there was no significant difference between the proviral load of Tax 301-309 tetramer-positive AC and negative AC (mean Ϯ SE, 72.4 Ϯ 9.4 vs 53.5 Ϯ 11.6; Table IV). The reason why the proviral load of Tax 301-309 tetramer-positive AC was lower than that of negative AC can be explained by the negative group containing many Tax [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] tetramer-positive AC (7 of 13). Therefore, we omitted HLA-A*02-positive (including HLA-A*0201 and HLA-A*0206) subjects in analysis of Tax 301-309 tetramer.…”
Section: Htlv-1 Proviral Load In Ac and Atl Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations