2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00373-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor radiosensitivity (SF2) is a prognostic factor for local control in head and neck cancers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
72
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion also concurs with seminal studies of Malaise et al (1987) and Deacon et al (1984), updated by Steel (1996) in which they provide considerable evidence that the radiosensitivity of tumours is most reliably measured at 2 Gy. The clinical studies of West and colleagues would support this proposition (West et al, 1997;Bjork-Eriksson et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This conclusion also concurs with seminal studies of Malaise et al (1987) and Deacon et al (1984), updated by Steel (1996) in which they provide considerable evidence that the radiosensitivity of tumours is most reliably measured at 2 Gy. The clinical studies of West and colleagues would support this proposition (West et al, 1997;Bjork-Eriksson et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…West and colleagues have shown that biopsies from cervix and head and neck tumours can be used to predict for an individual patient's response to radiotherapy using clonogenic cell survival following exposure to 2 Gy X-irradiation (West et al, 1997;Bjork-Eriksson et al, 2000). The main disadvantages of this assay are that a minimum of 4 weeks is required to obtain a result, and about 30% of excised tumours failed to grow in soft agar; success of this method in other tumour types has been elusive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three groups are composed of radiosensitive tumors false(SF2<0.4false), semisensitive tumors false(SF2=0.4false), and radioresistant tumors false(SF2>0.4false). The value of 0.4 has been determined based on the clinical study by Bjork‐Eriksson et al (16) In addition, it was assumed that the SF2 value for normal tissue is constant false(SF2=0.4false). The values of α/β ratios for tumor cells and normal cells were considered to be 10 Gy and 2.5 Gy, respectively (17) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This 'intrinsic' radiosensitivity differs largely between tumour types and is at least partly due to the different sensitivity of the respective tumour cells Deacon et al, 1984;Fertil and Malaise, 1985). It was further shown that within one type of tumours, the outcome of the individual patients after radiotherapy was reflected by the in vitro radiosensitivity (SF2) of their tumour cells (West et al, 1993(West et al, , 1995Stausbol-Gron and Overgaard, 1999;Björk-Eriksson et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%