2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/3435673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor Regression Grade Predicts Survival in Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma Patients with Lymph Node Metastasis

Abstract: Background. Tumor regression grade (TRG) is widely used in gastrointestinal carcinoma to evaluate pathological responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), but whether it is an independent prognostic factor is still controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate the value of TRG in locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients who underwent NCT and curative resection. Methods. Pathological regression was reevaluated according to the Mandard TRG. Survival curves were obtained by the Kaplan–Meier meth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, it is thought that histologic tumor response does not adequately reflect chemoresistant metastatic tumor load and thus it alone would not be correlated to potential of recurrence 19,20 . Secondly, colinearity and connection between TRG and other pathological factors might lead to loss of TRG significance 21 . Additionally, the relatively small sample size of our study might have limited the assessment of TRG in predicting survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, it is thought that histologic tumor response does not adequately reflect chemoresistant metastatic tumor load and thus it alone would not be correlated to potential of recurrence 19,20 . Secondly, colinearity and connection between TRG and other pathological factors might lead to loss of TRG significance 21 . Additionally, the relatively small sample size of our study might have limited the assessment of TRG in predicting survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…DFS plots stratified by change in systemic immune-inflammation index (ΔSII) F I G U R E 2 OS plots stratified by change in systemic immune-inflammation index (ΔSII) histologic tumor response does not adequately reflect chemoresistant metastatic tumor load and thus it alone would not be correlated to potential of recurrence 19,20. Secondly, colinearity and connection between TRG and other pathological factors might lead to loss of TRG significance 21. Additionally, the relatively small sample size of our study might have limited the assessment of TRG in predicting survival.Systemic inflammation has also prognostic value in solid tumors because it promotes dissemination and several inflammatory indices have been shown to predict survival in various cancers 22.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…POC induces a histopathological response that may be expressed through the tumor regression grading (TRG) 8 , 10 , 12 , 22 and the assessment of the effects of TNM downstaging 10 , 20 . This response provides information regarding the tumor’s chemosensitivity and helps to predict prognosis 22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…POC induces a histopathological response that may be expressed through the tumor regression grading (TRG) 8 , 10 , 12 , 22 and the assessment of the effects of TNM downstaging 10 , 20 . This response provides information regarding the tumor’s chemosensitivity and helps to predict prognosis 22 . The TRG is a better tool to evaluate the effects of POC since the TNM downstaging results from the comparison between clinical and pathological staging and, more recently, also post-neoadjuvant therapy staging — the yTNM 8 , 22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation