2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3835(03)00003-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor-specific glycosylation of the carcinoma-associated epithelial cell adhesion molecule EpCAM in head and neck carcinomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Point mutation analysis of potential Nglycosylation sites verified that all three sites in EpCAM are modified in human epithelial cells (see Figure 1A) in contrast to data claiming the lack of glycosylation at Asp 198 (Chong and Speicher, 2001). Studies with tumour samples from head and neck cancer patients indicate that EpCAM can be aberrantly glycosylated on tumour cells (Pauli et al, 2003). The nature and functional implications of these carbohydrate modifications awaits further analysis.…”
Section: Epcam Structure and Functionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Point mutation analysis of potential Nglycosylation sites verified that all three sites in EpCAM are modified in human epithelial cells (see Figure 1A) in contrast to data claiming the lack of glycosylation at Asp 198 (Chong and Speicher, 2001). Studies with tumour samples from head and neck cancer patients indicate that EpCAM can be aberrantly glycosylated on tumour cells (Pauli et al, 2003). The nature and functional implications of these carbohydrate modifications awaits further analysis.…”
Section: Epcam Structure and Functionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Secondly, the extracellular domain of EpCAM is assumably responsible for the aggregation of EpCAM upon binding of an extracellular ligand and/or homophilic aggregation due to overexpression. Additional experiments from our laboratory demonstrated a tissue-specific glycosylation of EpCAM in tumours, raising the question of different functions of these variants (Pauli et al, 2003). Elucidating the impact of such a modification may help to explain the potentially different roles of EpCAM in healthy and diseased tissues with respect to ligand binding and/or self-aggregation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, HO-3, just like the great majority of EpCAM-specific antibodies, targets EpCAM mainly within the EGF like domains, which represent the most immunogenic components of this protein (Balzar et al, 1999). Driven by the knowledge of differential glycosylation of EpCAM in normal vs carcinoma tissue (Pauli et al, 2003), we assessed the dependence of HO-3 binding on the glycosylation status of the molecule. A potential impact of post-translational modification of EpCAM on the binding of therapeutic antibodies available so far remained entirely unexplored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential usage of these N-glycosylation sequences results in the generation of EpCAM variants of different sizes ranging from 37 to 42 kDa. Notably, a hyperglycosylation pattern was observed in head and neck carcinoma when compared with healthy EpCAMpositive epithelium (Pauli et al, 2003). EpCAM was strongly glycosylated in 77% of cases of head and neck carcinomas studied (n ¼ 44).…”
Section: Recognition Of Epcam By Ho-3 Is Independent Of Epcam's Glycomentioning
confidence: 90%