2022
DOI: 10.1039/d1mh01969d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor-targeted nano-delivery system of therapeutic RNA

Abstract: The birth of RNAi technology has pioneered actionability at the molecular level. Compared to DNA, RNA is less stable and therefore requires more demanding delivery vehicles for its delivery. With...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 236 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is common knowledge that the EPR effect can increase the accumulation of local drug concentration. Compared with active targeting ( Wang et al, 2022b ), the delivery efficiency of EPR is lower, which is not enough to make the drug completely distributed in the tumor tissue. Moreover, due to the specificity of the tumor microenvironment, the tumor has a certain resistance to temperature changes and ROS, leading to the failure to eliminate all tumor cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is common knowledge that the EPR effect can increase the accumulation of local drug concentration. Compared with active targeting ( Wang et al, 2022b ), the delivery efficiency of EPR is lower, which is not enough to make the drug completely distributed in the tumor tissue. Moreover, due to the specificity of the tumor microenvironment, the tumor has a certain resistance to temperature changes and ROS, leading to the failure to eliminate all tumor cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 5c, the cellular uptake of Bio‐PEG‐CN/DNA complexes was significantly decreased at low temperature compared to 37°C, suggesting that the internalization of these complexes was at least partially realized by energy‐dependent endocytosis 53 . It should be noted that endocytosis is considered to be the main route for non‐viral nanocarriers to enter cells, and it proceeds via different mechanisms: caveolae‐mediated endocytosis (CavME), clathrin‐mediated endocytosis (CME), and “lipid rafts”‐like endocytosis and micropinocytosis 54 . Herein, genistein (GE, CavME inhibitor), 55 amiloride hydrochloride (AM, macropinocytosis inhibitor), 53 methyl‐β‐cyclodextrin (MβCD, “lipid rafts”‐like endocytosis inhibitor), 56 and chlorpromazine (CPZ, CME inhibitor) 53 were utilized to identify the main mechanism of cellular uptake for this system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 It should be noted that endocytosis is considered to be the main route for non-viral nanocarriers to enter cells, and it proceeds via different mechanisms: caveolae-mediated endocytosis (CavME), clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME), and "lipid rafts"-like endocytosis and micropinocytosis. 54 Herein, genistein (GE, CavME inhibitor), 55 amiloride hydrochloride (AM, macropinocytosis inhibitor), 53 methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD, "lipid rafts"-like endocytosis inhibitor), 56 and chlorpromazine (CPZ, CME inhibitor) 53 were utilized to identify the main mechanism of cellular uptake for this system. As shown in Figure 5d, after the Bio-PEG-CN/DNA complexes were pre-incubated with GE or AM at 37 C, the fluorescence signal in the cells decreased significantly.…”
Section: Internalization Of Dna Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The mechanism of endocytosis could be respectively divided into: macropinocytosis, clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME), caveolae-mediated endocytosis (CavME) and ‘‘lipid rafts’’-like endocytosis. 50 Subsequently, amiloride hydrochloride (AM, macropinocytosis inhibitor), 51 chlorpromazine (CPZ, CME inhibitor), 51 genistein (GE, caveolae-mediated endocytosis inhibitor), 52 and methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD, ‘‘lipid rafts’’-like endocytosis inhibitor) 53 were used to determine the mechanism of cell internalization. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%