2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.03.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumor thickness and adnexal extension of superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC) as determinants of treatment failure for methylaminolevulinate (MAL)-photodynamic therapy (PDT), imiquimod, and 5-fluorouracil (FU)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that tumor-free survival at 3 years post-treatment was 58.0% for MAL-PDT (95% confidence interval [CI] = 47.8-66.9), 68.2% for topical fluorouracil (95% CI = 58.1-76.3) and 79.7% for imiquimod (95% CI = 71.6-85.7), with clear evidence that topical imiquimod was superior to MAL-PDT (treatment failure hazard ratio for imiquimod compared with MAL-PDT was 0.50, 95% CI = 0.33-0.76, P = 0.001). Tumour thickness does not seem to predict treatment failure for topical imiquimod, PDT or topical 5-fluorouracil (Roozeboom et al, 2015). We have been unable to identify any further trials comparing topical imiquimod versus other active therapies for the treatment of low risk nodular or superficial BCC, and none with 5 years follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…They found that tumor-free survival at 3 years post-treatment was 58.0% for MAL-PDT (95% confidence interval [CI] = 47.8-66.9), 68.2% for topical fluorouracil (95% CI = 58.1-76.3) and 79.7% for imiquimod (95% CI = 71.6-85.7), with clear evidence that topical imiquimod was superior to MAL-PDT (treatment failure hazard ratio for imiquimod compared with MAL-PDT was 0.50, 95% CI = 0.33-0.76, P = 0.001). Tumour thickness does not seem to predict treatment failure for topical imiquimod, PDT or topical 5-fluorouracil (Roozeboom et al, 2015). We have been unable to identify any further trials comparing topical imiquimod versus other active therapies for the treatment of low risk nodular or superficial BCC, and none with 5 years follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Tumor dimensions and stage of disease progression may also influence therapy. A study of BCC with a tumor thickness less than 1.0 mm or adnexal extension have not been found to significantly increase treatment failure using methylaminolevulinate, imiquimod and 5‐fluorouracil . Ulceration on BCC may enhance the imiquimod therapeutic response by facilitated entry into the tumor stroma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A study of BCC with a tumor thickness less than 1.0 mm or adnexal extension have not been found to significantly increase treatment failure using methylaminolevulinate, imiquimod and 5-fluorouracil. 24 Ulceration on BCC may enhance the imiquimod therapeutic response 25 by facilitated entry into the tumor stroma. Future studies may investigate the variation in ulceration features between superficial and nodular BCC subtypes and whether this information may also be incorporated into the therapeutic choice for a given BCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No association has been found between superficial BCC tumour thickness (up to 1 mm) and PDT failure [40]. Deep curettage prior to PDT may be beneficial for selected tumours, with cosmetic results maintained [41].…”
Section: Basal Cell Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%