Background: Surgical removal is the first choice of treatment for large cystic brain metastases. However, some patients cannot undergo surgical resection due to their general condition and/or the tumor location. Aims: In this study, we investigated the feasibility and safety of stereotactic cyst aspiration and gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR) as an alternative treatment for these lesions and followed the volumetric changes in cystic and solid portions. Methods: Between February 2005 and March 2012, a total of 24 patients underwent GKR after cyst aspiration for 29 cystic metastatic brain tumors. The median age was 60 years (range, 18-81). The number of male patients was 18 and that of female patients 6. Most of the patients were in class II (87.5%) based on the data of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group using recursive partitioning analysis. We analyzed the changes in tumor volume, the local control rate, intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Before aspiration, the mean total tumor volume was 32.7 cm3 (range, 12.1-103.3) and cystic volume was 18.6 cm3 (range, 8-72.3). The mean duration of cyst drainage was 1 day (range, 1-2). The mean amount of aspiration was 16.8 cm3 (range, 6-67.4). After aspiration, the total mean volume was 12.4 cm3 (range, 3.7-38.1) and cystic volume was 2.0 cm3 (range, 0.1-9.5). The nature of the cyst was serous in 18, serous and hemorrhagic in 3, and serous and necrotic in 8. The median prescription dose was 16 Gy (range, 14-20). There was no treatment-related complication. The local control rate was 58.6% (17/29). The median survival to local recurrence was 6.0 (±1.42) months. During the follow-up period, an Ommaya reservoir was placed in 3 patients. Insertion of an Ommaya reservoir and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or GKR were done in 2 patients, WBRT in 2, GKR in 1 and operation in 1. The median intracranial PFS and OS after intracranial metastasis was 5.2 (±0.42) and 6.8 (±0.38) months. Conclusions: Cyst aspiration and GKR were feasible and safe but not very efficient, which could be an alternative option for large cystic metastases in patients who could not expect longer survival time.