Optical, Opto-Atomic, and Entanglement-Enhanced Precision Metrology II 2020
DOI: 10.1117/12.2552602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tunable geometries from a sparse quantum spin network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multimode cavities also establish connections to neural network and spin models, enabling investigations into dislocations, crystal boundaries, and phonon spectra. Initial investigations into this relationship were presented by [237,238], while extensions involving fermionic atoms [239,240] and local couplings using multimode cavity QED have been explored [35,241].…”
Section: Atoms In Optical Cavitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multimode cavities also establish connections to neural network and spin models, enabling investigations into dislocations, crystal boundaries, and phonon spectra. Initial investigations into this relationship were presented by [237,238], while extensions involving fermionic atoms [239,240] and local couplings using multimode cavity QED have been explored [35,241].…”
Section: Atoms In Optical Cavitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1c we obtain translational invariance in the treelike geometry, i.e. d tree (i + 1, j + 1) = d tree (i, j) [17,[48][49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Probing Emergent Geometry With Entanglement Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%

Tunable Geometries in Sparse Clifford Circuits

Hashizume,
Kuriyattil,
Daley
et al. 2022
Preprint
Self Cite
“…Specifically, while both measures of distance satisfy the usual mathematical axioms required for a metric, the 2-adic measure is ultrametric, meaning that it satisfies a much stronger form of the triangle inequality |i − j| 2 ≤ max(|i − k| 2 , |j − k| 2 ) for all i, j, k. Additionally, while both geometries are translation-invariant (i, j) → (i + , j + ) mod N, the treelike geometry is also invariant under a much larger number of nested permutation symmetries which exchange the left and right halves of any subtree. In particular, by consecutively applying exchange permutations at each level of the tree in Figure 1c we obtain translational invariance in the treelike geometry, i.e., d tree (i + 1, j + 1) = d tree (i, j) [17,18,[48][49][50][51].…”
Section: Probing Emergent Geometry With Entanglement Entropymentioning
confidence: 99%