“…For a fixed applied potential, θ H may sharply decrease with increasing pH, which we indeed observed in the catholyte for all electrochemical experiments (as drastic as pH 1.70 to 11.85, Figure S41). We therefore hypothesize that transient θ H plays a role in steering the reaction selectivities seen in Figure a, such as by controlling hydrogenation of surface intermediates to form NO x * and NH y * species. , Our calculated potential of zero charge (negative of −1.0 V RHE for nearly all θ H , Table S5) leads to a positively charged surface, likely promoting anionic nitrate adsorption, which is often the rate-determining step of NO 3 RR. , The DFT calculations predict that, regardless of the initial θ H , nitrogen species are competitive for surface sites compared to H (Figure b). While molecular nitrate (NO 3 *) exhibits weak adsorption that gets weaker with increasing NO 3 RR overpotential, dissociative adsorption into nitrite (NO 2 *) and surface (hydr)oxide, O(H)*, is favorable.…”