2022
DOI: 10.15252/msb.202110843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tunable transcription factor library for robust quantification of regulatory properties in Escherichia coli

Abstract: Predicting the quantitative regulatory function of transcription factors (TFs) based on factors such as binding sequence, binding location, and promoter type is not possible. The interconnected nature of gene networks and the difficulty in tuning individual TF concentrations make the isolated study of TF function challenging. Here, we present a library of Escherichia coli strains designed to allow for precise control of the concentration of individual TFs enabling the study of the role o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous DAP-seq binding analysis using purified TFs and genomic DNA fragments identified MetR binding sites at metF and folE promoters 42 , but the in vivo regulatory responses have never been tested. We further verified these regulatory responses using a MetR knockdown strain from the tunable TF library 34 (Fig. 4c ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous DAP-seq binding analysis using purified TFs and genomic DNA fragments identified MetR binding sites at metF and folE promoters 42 , but the in vivo regulatory responses have never been tested. We further verified these regulatory responses using a MetR knockdown strain from the tunable TF library 34 (Fig. 4c ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…showed only weak perturbation effects (i.e., less than 30% promoter activity change) under our growth conditions in minimal glucose medium. To further validate these findings, we selected seven TF genes and measured their promoter activities across a wide range of TF concentrations using a tunable E. coli TF library 34 , in which each endogenous TF is replaced by an inducible TF-mCherry fusion (Supplementary Fig. 8 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, combining our GR reporters with strains from the KEIO collection (Baba et al , 2006) and the ASKA library (Kitagawa et al , 2005) should allow assessing how much a given gene influences the GRs. Similarly, a ‘Tunable TF library’(Parisutham et al , 2022) was recently produced to synthetically tune the concentration of most TFs. However, it cannot monitor natural production rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used E. coli K-12 MG1655 cells (WT strain), as it is also used in (Zaslaver et al , 2006; Taniguchi et al , 2010; Parisutham et al , 2022). Chemically competent (CC) E. coli K-12 MG1655 cells were prepared for plasmid transformation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mini‐Tn5) and contained ~1.4 × 10 5 independent clones (Scholz et al., 2019 ). Other integrated libraries are limited to a maximum of 3 × 10 4 clones (Biggs et al., 2020 ; Cowie et al., 2006 ; Elmore et al., 2017 ; Parisutham et al., 2022 ; Saleski et al., 2021 ). Developing efficient systems that can integrate large gene libraries would facilitate more effective screening of combinatorial libraries and the implementation of continuous selection processes in synthetic evolution (Simon et al., 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%