2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.12.1150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuneable energy barriers in tetrairon(III) single-molecule magnets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously reported, compound 1 has D 3 molecular symmetry, with the three binary axes directed along Fe1···Fe2, Fe1···Fe2‘ and Fe1···Fe2‘ ‘ (Figure a).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As previously reported, compound 1 has D 3 molecular symmetry, with the three binary axes directed along Fe1···Fe2, Fe1···Fe2‘ and Fe1···Fe2‘ ‘ (Figure a).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…We have found that complex 5 can be converted into a new class of SMMs ( 1 − 4 ) by exchanging the bridging methoxides with tripodal ligands H 3 L = R−C(CH 2 OH) 3 (see Scheme ), as previously communicated . The reaction proceeds smoothly in organic solvents and allows modulating the molecular structure and magnetic parameters of the clusters by a proper choice of the R substituent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A signal centered at g = 2.00 observed in the film is attributed to the presence of an Fe 3+ impurity,31 probably the very volatile Fe(dpm) 3 complex 20. A further point to be noted is that the spectra of bulk samples show a splitting of the lines in the parallel region, a feature already reported for this cluster and attributed to the existence of two nonequivalent molecules with slightly different axial anisotropy 22, 32. The absence of this splitting in the spectra of evaporated samples suggests that a slight modification of the crystalline environment of the cluster occurs as a consequence of the deposition process, possibly resulting in a distribution of axial anisotropies for the deposited clusters.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%