2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.inoche.2021.108804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning adsorption capacity of metal–organic frameworks with Al3+ for phosphorus removal: Kinetics, isotherm and regeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S8†), and the DUT-5 surface is negative, the electrostatic interactions are negligible. 37 For arsenate adsorption, the chemical speciation (Fig. S9†) is H 3 AsO 4 (at pH < 2.1), H 2 AsO 4 − (2.1 < pH < 6.7), and HAsO 4 2− (pH > 6.7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S8†), and the DUT-5 surface is negative, the electrostatic interactions are negligible. 37 For arsenate adsorption, the chemical speciation (Fig. S9†) is H 3 AsO 4 (at pH < 2.1), H 2 AsO 4 − (2.1 < pH < 6.7), and HAsO 4 2− (pH > 6.7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that DUT-5 is exceeding to Ce-BDC, 39 HP-UiO-66(Zr), 40 NH 2 -MIL-101(X, X = Al and Fe), 28 Gd-PTA, 41 and Fe–Al-MOF. 37…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were taken at specific time intervals (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 h) during the adsorption process and analyzed by atomic adsorption equipment. Kinetics data was analysis by the pseudo-first order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models with the aim to explain if adsorption was carried out by physisorption and chemisorption respectively [ 41 , 42 ], expressed in Equations (4) and (5) [ 40 ], where q e and q t are the adsorption capacity (mg g −1 ) in equilibrium and in contact at time t , respectively, C 0 , C t , and C e are the concentrations of Pb(II) (mg L −1 ) contained in the original solution, after time t and equilibrium, respectively, V is the volume of the solution (mL), and m represents the weight of Co-MTPhPyP (g) where k 1 (1 min −1 ) y k 2 (g mg −1 min −1 ) are the constants in these two models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crystallographic analysis of NH 2 -MIL-101(Fe), NH 2 -MIL-101(Al), and UiO-66-NH 2 were in well agreement with the literature. 14,25,32 Briefly, the characteristic peaks at 7.43°and 8.34°corresponding to (111) and ( 200) crystal faces were obtained in UiO-66-NH 2 . For NH 2 -MIL-101(Al), peaks at 2.4°, 4.01°, 5.8°, 9.09°, 12.1°, and 17.8°described the crystalline structure of the MOF.…”
Section: Adsorbent Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%