2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2943414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning field-induced energy gap of bilayer graphene via interlayer spacing

Abstract: Our first-principles calculations reveal surprisingly high sensitivity of the field-induced energy gap of bilayer graphene to changes in its interlayer spacing. Small adjustments in the interlayer spacing near its equilibrium value produce large modulations in the gap over a wide range of field strength. We elucidate the mechanism for the extremely effective gap tuning by examining the interlayer charge redistribution driven by the coupled electric field and nanomechanical effect.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5͑b͔͒ consistent with earlier density-functional results. 13,14 The magnitude of the band gap increases linearly for small electric fields and saturates for higher electric fields as seen from Fig. 5͑d͒.…”
Section: Bilayer Graphene In the Bernal Structurementioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5͑b͔͒ consistent with earlier density-functional results. 13,14 The magnitude of the band gap increases linearly for small electric fields and saturates for higher electric fields as seen from Fig. 5͑d͒.…”
Section: Bilayer Graphene In the Bernal Structurementioning
confidence: 66%
“…11,12 Hence, a uniaxial strain, which changes the interlayer spacing, could modulate the field-induced band gap. 13,14 The other factor that controls the gap is the screening of the electric field. An applied electric field causes unequal charge distribution among the graphene layers which in turn creates a polarized electric field in the opposite direction, 7 thereby reducing the effective electric field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another route to open the gap is more practical to break the symmetry between sublattice in graphene by setting it onto a solid substrate or in applied fields. [12][13][14][15] A single-layer graphene on most of the substrates becomes a trivial buffer layer due to the breaking of the hexagonal π-orbital network as a result of strong bonding to the supports, [16][17][18] and a second layer is often necessary to be functional on a substrate. Although these routes are helpful for certain applications, none of them consider the essential interaction between the graphene edge and the substrate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because that E g and E and ∆, respectively. 22,41 ∆ is the potential difference between the upper and bottom layers and obviously increases as a function of electric fields. t ′ is the interlayer hopping between the direct atoms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%