The first examples of osmium(II) complexes of the type [Os(L)(dmso)Cl] + (L = tripodal ligand) are reported. Photoactivation is shown to be a convenient route for performing ligand substitution reactions in such complexes. Photochemical bond activation works where thermal and electrochemical routes fail. Drastic differences are presented in the reactivity of the Os complexes with the pyridine-containing ligands versus the triazole-containing ligands. A detailed experimental and theoretical investigation into photochemical bond activation reactions is presented.The development of modern coordination chemistry is intricately linked to the development and the understanding of ligand substitution reactions at a metal center. [1] From the time of Alfred Werner, the father of coordination chemistry, [2] until now, ligand substitution reactions usually formed and still form the basis for the synthesis of novel transition metal complexes. Normally, the principles used for such substitution reactions are the labilization of existing metal-ligand bonds, and the concomitant formation of new metal-ligand bonds. For performing such reactions synthetic chemists usually use the thermal method. [1] Less frequently electrochemical or photochemical bond activation strategies are used for the synthesis of novel transition metal complexes as well. While weakening of existing metal-ligand bonds is at the heart of all the three aforementioned methods, the ways and means in which such weakening is achieved are very different for all three methods. Particularly intriguing is the comparison of a thermal bond activation to the photochemical bond activation of the same bond. For a thermal process, continuous heating is a prerequisite to achieve higher temperatures. However, for a photochemical process, the choice of photon of the right energy can help one to selectively activate bonds, which might otherwise not be possible to perform with a thermal process. These differences had led Porterfield to make his famous statement regarding photochemical reactions with a particular stress on their differences to thermal reactions: "it is thus possible to have a hot molecule without ever having a warm molecule". [1,3] For late transition metal complexes, the strength of the metal-ligand bond is known to drastically increase as one moves from a 3d metal center to a 5d metal center within a particular group. [4] Thus, while considering group 8, Fe II forms relatively labile bonds to ligands, whereas Os II forms very inert bonds. [4] A consequence of this fact is the notoriously difficult ligand substitution reactions at Os II centers, and the corresponding difficulties in synthesizing Os II analogues of wellknown Ru II complexes. [4,5] In keeping with our interest in investigating metal-ligand bond activation reactions at divalent group 8 metal centers, [6] we asked ourselves the question: "How inert are Os-ligand bonds and to what extent is the labilization of such supposedly inert bonds linked to the method used for such labilization (thermal, e...