2021
DOI: 10.3390/electronicmat2030020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning Magnetic and Transport Properties in Quasi-2D (Mn1−xNix)2P2S6 Single Crystals

Abstract: We report an optimized chemical vapor transport method to grow single crystals of (Mn1−xNix)2P2S6 where x = 0, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 1. Single crystals up to 4 mm × 3 mm × 200 μm were obtained by this method. As-grown crystals are characterized by means of scanning electron microscopy and powder X-ray diffraction measurements. The structural characterization shows that all crystals crystallize in monoclinic symmetry with the space group C2/m (No. 12). We have further investigated the magnetic properties of this s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This two-step process has proven necessary to obtain homogeneous single crystals with the desired degree of Ni-substitution. A similar approach was used by us for the crystal growth in the closely related substitution series (Mn 1−x Ni x ) 2 P 2 S 6 [22].…”
Section: Crystal Growth and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This two-step process has proven necessary to obtain homogeneous single crystals with the desired degree of Ni-substitution. A similar approach was used by us for the crystal growth in the closely related substitution series (Mn 1−x Ni x ) 2 P 2 S 6 [22].…”
Section: Crystal Growth and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origin of the observed abrupt evolution of the magnetic anisotropy around x Ni may be subject to future investigations, for example if it can be continuously tuned from Ising-like to XXZ-like in the narrow regime between (Fe 0.1 Ni 0.9 ) 2 P 2 S 6 and Ni 2 P 2 S 6 . Also, it will be interesting to compare the evolution of the magnetic behavior and anisotropy of (Fe 1−x Ni x ) 2 P 2 S 6 in detail to closely related systems, such as (Mn 1−x Fe x ) 2 P 2 S 6 [20] and (Mn 1−x Ni x ) 2 P 2 S 6 [22]. Finally, we emphasize that crystals grown in this work may also allow to study the substitution dependence of electronic properties within this series.…”
Section: Conclusion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Please note that the Cu1 site is empty and only listed here for comparison with the structure proposed by Colombet et al[17].crystal structure model in C2/c. If, in contrast, Cu and Cr would have the same oxidation state of 2+, a random distribution of these ions on the M sites on the honeycomb lattice would be rather expected, as, e.g., observed for FeNiP 2 S 6 and other homocharge substituted M 2 P 2 S 6 compounds[28,31,32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…No additional reflection were observed demonstrating the phase purity of our crystals. The C2/m space group, which is typically observed for compounds of the M 2 P 2 S 6 family [19,22], including M 2+ M 2+ P 2 S 6 compounds of isovalent substitution series (e.g., MnFeP 2 S 6 [10], MnNiP 2 S 6 [11] and FeNiP 2 S 6 [13]), can be ruled out. Assuming a monoclinic unit cell, several observed reflections correspond to Laue indices that are systematically absent for C centering, as they violate the reflection condition hkl: h + k = 2n.…”
Section: Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Mn 1−x Ni x ) 2 P 2 S 6 [11], (Fe 1−x Ni x ) 2 P 2 S 6 [12,13] and (Zn 1−x Ni x ) 2 P 2 S 6 [4]) are reported to exhibit solid solution behavior and, thus, imply a random distribution of the substituents on the honeycomb network, as illustrated in Fig. 1(a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%