2019
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.100.013413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning nonthermal distributions to thermal ones in time-dependent Paul traps

Abstract: We study the probability distribution of an atomic ion being laser-cooled in a periodically-driven Paul trap using a Floquet approach to the semiclassical photon scattering dynamics. We show that despite the microscopic nonequilibrium forces, a stationary thermal-like exponential distribution can be obtained in the Hamiltonian action, or equivalently in the number of quanta (phonons) of the motion linearized about the zero of the potential. At the presence of additional stray electric fields, the ion is pushed… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(151 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting absorption and emission rates are equal on average, even if there are finite delays between these events. A more detailed derivation of the photon absorption probability from the optical Bloch equations will be presented separately in [31] using a Floquet approach, which allows one to improve the accuracy of accounting for the micromotion drive. Let us consider an ion moving in the trap, and at some arbitrary time t a when it is at position r a with momentum p a (velocity v a ), it absorbs a laser photon of energy (ω L + ∆).…”
Section: A the Zero Lifetime Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting absorption and emission rates are equal on average, even if there are finite delays between these events. A more detailed derivation of the photon absorption probability from the optical Bloch equations will be presented separately in [31] using a Floquet approach, which allows one to improve the accuracy of accounting for the micromotion drive. Let us consider an ion moving in the trap, and at some arbitrary time t a when it is at position r a with momentum p a (velocity v a ), it absorbs a laser photon of energy (ω L + ∆).…”
Section: A the Zero Lifetime Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with S(I, t) a probability flux, Π I (I) an action drift coefficient and Π II (I) a diffusion coefficient. The calculation of Π I and Π II proceeds in a straightforward by using the formulas derived for a linear Floquet system in [28]. If we find a region of action where the ion remains bounded for a very long time (as determined by the Fokker-Planck dynamics), we can assume an approximately stationary probability distribution in the action, which then takes the form Taking concrete physical parameters we consider a 24 Mg + ion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean photon scattering rate is 1.2 × 10 6 s −1 × s L , with s L the saturation parameter. This rate can be contrasted with the rate at the effective trap minimum [28], (Γs L /2)/ 1 + [2∆/Γ] 2 , which gives 66 × 10 6 s −1 × s L for the optimal detuning ∆ = −Γ/2, but 0.3 × 10 6 s −1 × s L for ∆ = −10.6Γ. The photons can be detected and a Fourier transform of the fluoresence would show peaks at the s-subharmonics of the rf drive frequency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations