2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.06.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning of Fractional Order PI λ D μ Controllers using Evolutionary Optimization for PID Tuned Synchronous Generator Excitation System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The MOOP formulation and its solution can be obtained in the following three ways: The multi‐objective problems consisting of two or more conflicting performance indices generates a set of non‐dominated solutions by making trade‐offs between objective functions. These nondominated solutions can be obtained in the form of Pareto optimal fronts 22,24 The one way to formulate the conflicting vector valued problem is to normalize the vector along the y ‐axis, which represent the common y ‐axis's of the optimization problem Fnormalopt.$$ {F}_{\mathrm{opt}.}…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The MOOP formulation and its solution can be obtained in the following three ways: The multi‐objective problems consisting of two or more conflicting performance indices generates a set of non‐dominated solutions by making trade‐offs between objective functions. These nondominated solutions can be obtained in the form of Pareto optimal fronts 22,24 The one way to formulate the conflicting vector valued problem is to normalize the vector along the y ‐axis, which represent the common y ‐axis's of the optimization problem Fnormalopt.$$ {F}_{\mathrm{opt}.}…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reduced order LQG/LTR controller has been proposed by using Kalman filter toward output side of the plant for the nonminimum phase systems, however, the LTR will be done with full order assumptions 21 . Design of cascaded FO PID‐IO PID was formulated as a multi‐objective problem for minimization of control effort and ISE to achieve the robust stability 22 . Discrete PID based on the LQR with fractional order integral performance index (PI) and real coded genetic algorithm (GA) optimized weighting matrices 23 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In adaptive stabilization for generator excitation system, the possibility of application of the model reference adaptive control theory for stabilizer design is analyzed in Ritonja (2011). For a synchronous generator excitation system, the design of cascaded integer order PID-fractional order PID controller by evolutionary multi-objective-based optimization approach is presented in Kumar et al (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are some genetic and evolutionary optimization algorithms [21], heuristic algorithms such as particle swarm [22,23] and group hunting [24], designing fractional-order PID controllers in time domain [25][26][27][28][29][30]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%