2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04921-7_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning of Large-Scale Linguistic Equation (LE) Models with Genetic Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scaling functions handle efficiently the parameter constraints of the monotonously increasing second order polynomials and the whole system is configured with a set of parameters. (Juuso, 2009a)…”
Section: Genetic Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scaling functions handle efficiently the parameter constraints of the monotonously increasing second order polynomials and the whole system is configured with a set of parameters. (Juuso, 2009a)…”
Section: Genetic Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinear scaling technique is needed in constructing nonlinear models with linear equations (Juuso, 2004a). Constraints handling (Juuso, 2009a) and data-based analysis (Juuso and Lahdelma, 2010), improve possibilities to update the scaling functions recursively (Juuso, 2011). The LE approach together with knowledge-based systems, neural networks and evolutionary computation form the computational intelligence part (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feasible range is defined as a trapezoidal membership function defined by support and core areas, see [26]. The scaling functions are monotonously increasing throughout the feasible range, see [22,27]. This is satisfied if the coefficients, are restricted to the range .…”
Section: Nonlinear Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constraints are taken into account by moving the corner points or the upper and lower limits if needed. The systems can be tuned with genetic algorithms [27].…”
Section: Nonlinear Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feasible range is defined by a membership function, and membership functions for finer partitions can be generated from membership definitions (Juuso et al, 1993). The basic scaling approach presented in (Juuso, 2004) has been improved later: a new constraint handling was introduced in (Juuso, 2009b), and a new skewness based methodology was presented for signal processing in (Juuso and Lahdelma, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%