Tuning of PID Conrollers: Survey of Siso and Mimo Techniques

Koivo, H.N.; Tanttu, Juha T.

doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)51299-9

Cited by 34 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Following an estimation of Koivo and Tanttu (1991), perhaps only 5-10% of man-implemented control loops cannot be controlled by single-input single-output (SISO) PI or PID controllers. However, this widespread usage also goes with numerous problems due to either poor tuning practice or limited capabilities offered by standard PI-PID schemes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Time sub-optimal nonlinear PI and PID controllers applied to longitudinal headway car control

Hua

Samson

2011

IFAC Proceedings Volumes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nonlinear PI and PID controllers combining time-(sub)optimality with linear control robustness and antiwindup properties are proposed for first-order and second-order integrator systems, without assuming that the control lower-bound and upper-bound are the opposite of each other. A complementary contribution is the introduction of an integral action with anti-windup properties into the control law, under the constraint of ensuring global asymptotic stability. For illustration purposes, the proposed PID solution is applied to the longitudinal headway control of a vehicle following another vehicle.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Time sub-optimal nonlinear PI and PID controllers applied to longitudinal headway car control

Hua

Samson

2011

IFAC Proceedings Volumes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It has been stated, for example, that in process control applications, more than 95% of the controllers are of PI or PID type [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Neglected by the academic research community until recently, work by K.J.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

PI and PID controller tuning rules: an overview and personal perspective

O’Dwyer¹

2006

IET Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC 2006)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…It has been suggested, for example, that just 5 to 10% of control loops cannot be controlled by SISO PI or PID controllers (Koivo and Tanttu, 1991); in particular, these controllers perform well for processes with benign dynamics and modest performance requirements (Astrom and Hagglund, 1995). It has been stated that 98% of control loops in the pulp and paper industries are controlled by SISO PI controllers (Bialkowski, 1996) and that, in process control applications, more than 95% of the controllers are of PID type (Astrom and Hagglund, 1995).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Summary of PI and PID Controller Tuning Rules for Processes with Time Delay. Part 1: PI Controller Tuning Rules

O’Dwyer¹

2000

IFAC Proceedings Volumes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ability of proportional integral (PI) and proportional integral derivative (PID) controllers to compensate many practical industrial processes has led to their wide acceptance in industrial applications. The requirement to choose either two or three controller parameters is perhaps most easily done using tuning rules. A summary of tuning rules for the PI control of single input, single output (SISO) processes with time delay is provided in this paper.

show abstract

Tuning of PID Conrollers: Survey of Siso and Mimo Techniques

Cited by 34 publications

References 32 publications

Time sub-optimal nonlinear PI and PID controllers applied to longitudinal headway car control

Time sub-optimal nonlinear PI and PID controllers applied to longitudinal headway car control

PI and PID controller tuning rules: an overview and personal perspective

A Summary of PI and PID Controller Tuning Rules for Processes with Time Delay. Part 1: PI Controller Tuning Rules

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About