2016
DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning the driving force for exciton dissociation in single-walled carbon nanotube heterojunctions

Abstract: Understanding the kinetics and energetics of interfacial electron transfer in molecular systems is crucial for the development of a broad array of technologies, including photovoltaics, solar fuel systems and energy storage. The Marcus formulation for electron transfer relates the thermodynamic driving force and reorganization energy for charge transfer between a given donor/acceptor pair to the kinetics and yield of electron transfer. Here we investigated the influence of the thermodynamic driving force for p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
103
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
10
103
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The LUMO level of C 60 was assumed using the reduction potential of fullerodendrimer (E 1 red  = −1.12 V vs Fc/Fc + )29. The LUMO offset between SWCNTs and C 60 affects the efficiency of the electron transfer from SWCNTs to C 60 22. Because the C1 energy level of (7, 5) SWCNT is lower than that of (6, 5) and (8, 3) SWCNTs, PL emission quenching from (7, 5) SWCNT was not observed, which is in marked contrast to that from (6, 5) and (8,3)SWCNTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The LUMO level of C 60 was assumed using the reduction potential of fullerodendrimer (E 1 red  = −1.12 V vs Fc/Fc + )29. The LUMO offset between SWCNTs and C 60 affects the efficiency of the electron transfer from SWCNTs to C 60 22. Because the C1 energy level of (7, 5) SWCNT is lower than that of (6, 5) and (8, 3) SWCNTs, PL emission quenching from (7, 5) SWCNT was not observed, which is in marked contrast to that from (6, 5) and (8,3)SWCNTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Blackburn et al . described an optimum LUMO offset between SWCNTs and C 60 of approximately 130 meV, which is satisfied for small diameter nanotubes, such as (8, 3), (9, 1), or (6, 5)22. These circumstances prompt us to investigate the fabrication of photosensitizer/co-catalyst interconnecting systems having coaxial nanowire structures by employing small diameter SWCNTs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, SWCNTs have emerged as a potential replacement for i) fullerene compounds acting as an electron accepter, ii) polymer acting as an electron donor, iii) hole extraction layers, and iv) transparent electrodes . However, the variability in nanotube electronic structure has been proven to have detrimental effect on the photovoltaic performance and the lifetime of charge carriers .…”
Section: Applications Of Sorted Carbon Nanotubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[166] A recent spectroscopic study by Ihly et al revealed that there can be a very strong driving force for efficient photoinduced electron transfer between SWNTs and particular fullerene derivatives, suggesting that further improvements to these systems could also be achieved by judicious choice of fullerene derivatives. [167]…”
Section: Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%