2013
DOI: 10.1002/adsc.201201104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuning the Peri Effect for Enantioselectivity: Asymmetric Hydrogenation of Unfunctionalized Olefins with the BIPI Ligands

Abstract: The modular nature of the BIPI ligands allows for systematic optimization of each ligand region. The development of ligands optimized for asymmetric hydrogenation of the challenging unfunctionalized olefin substrate class is described. The naphthyl peri position, C-8, has been identified as a critical stereocontrol element in the design of these ligands. Highly enantioselective ligands suitable for hydrogenation of tri-and tetrasubstituted olefins are detailed. COMMUNICATIONSA variety of structurally diverse B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The substrate scope is not restricted to the ( E )‐1,2‐dimethyl‐1,2‐diaryl substructure: several other ( E )‐1,2‐dialkyl‐1,2‐diaryl olefins (( E )‐ 2 r – y ), but also 1,1‐dialkyl‐2,2‐diaryl olefins ( 2 z and 2 aa ) and very challenging alkyl‐triaryl olefins ( 2 ae – ai ) were all hydrogenated with excellent yield, er, and dr. Importantly, catalyst ( R )‐ 1 o provided optimal results for all tested substrates, thus obviating the need to build up large catalyst libraries often required for other iridium‐based catalyst systems . Low enantioselectivity was observed only for extremely challenging substrates, that is, in which the Re ‐ and Si ‐faces are differentiated only by the electronic properties of the aromatic substituents (( Z )‐ 2 c and 2 ac ) or the length of an alkyl substituent ( 2 ab ) as well as for trialkyl‐aryl substrate 2 ad .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The substrate scope is not restricted to the ( E )‐1,2‐dimethyl‐1,2‐diaryl substructure: several other ( E )‐1,2‐dialkyl‐1,2‐diaryl olefins (( E )‐ 2 r – y ), but also 1,1‐dialkyl‐2,2‐diaryl olefins ( 2 z and 2 aa ) and very challenging alkyl‐triaryl olefins ( 2 ae – ai ) were all hydrogenated with excellent yield, er, and dr. Importantly, catalyst ( R )‐ 1 o provided optimal results for all tested substrates, thus obviating the need to build up large catalyst libraries often required for other iridium‐based catalyst systems . Low enantioselectivity was observed only for extremely challenging substrates, that is, in which the Re ‐ and Si ‐faces are differentiated only by the electronic properties of the aromatic substituents (( Z )‐ 2 c and 2 ac ) or the length of an alkyl substituent ( 2 ab ) as well as for trialkyl‐aryl substrate 2 ad .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the catalyst loading was decreased to an economically feasible level of 0.1 mol % [Ir(COD)Cl] 2 , less than 15% product formation was observed (last four ligands in bracket). Existing P,N-ligands including PHOX ligands, 23b Ph-LalithPhos, 28 and BIPI 210 29 produced unsatisfactory reactivity and enantioselectivity even with 1 mol % of [Ir(COD)Cl] 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…value of 99:1 at 10 °C with the opposite chirality. The ligand 5 c is more selective than the phosphine imidazoline ligands reported lately 18. The catalyst with the aminoindanyl‐substituted ligand 5 e produced an 80 % conversion in 89:11 e.r.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%