2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tunnel boring machine vibration-based deep learning for the ground identification of working faces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geological conditions are always continued in a construction site. Therefore, the shield parameters can be clustered as factors to evaluate the types of geological characteristics [14] , [15] , [16] .…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geological conditions are always continued in a construction site. Therefore, the shield parameters can be clustered as factors to evaluate the types of geological characteristics [14] , [15] , [16] .…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results demonstrated that the accuracy is significantly improved after adding the vibration data. Liu et al [13] mounted accelerometers on a tunnel boring machine to identify the ground conditions of the working face. They investigated a number of machine learning methods and concluded that residual neural network outperformed other methods and achieved the highest accuracy of 98.28%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some promising research domains for machine learning in tunnelling are the geological prognosis ahead of the face, the interpretation of monitoring results, automation and maintenance [32]. At present, however, research appears to be focussed on the following topics: prediction of TBM operational parameters [34,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46], penetration rate [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63], porewater pressure [64], ground settlement [65][66][67], disc cutter replacement [68][69][70], jamming risk [71,72] and geological classification [73][74][75][76]). Few authors estimated the face support pressure of TBMs with machine learning [35,52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%