2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tunnel boring machines (TBM) performance prediction: A case study using big data and deep learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TBMs provide face support pressures up to approximately 200 to 300 kPa in soft soils [104]. At every excavation step, the proposed model searches the optimal support pressure within the interval (50,250) kPa. According to the guidelines [4], based on a limit equilibrium approach for drained conditions, the required support pressure is calculated with…”
Section: Face Support Pressure and Settlementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…TBMs provide face support pressures up to approximately 200 to 300 kPa in soft soils [104]. At every excavation step, the proposed model searches the optimal support pressure within the interval (50,250) kPa. According to the guidelines [4], based on a limit equilibrium approach for drained conditions, the required support pressure is calculated with…”
Section: Face Support Pressure and Settlementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The support pressure p f is comprised in the discrete interval of natural integers (50, 250) kPa and is assigned in 50 kPa steps. Hence, the output layer is a vector with five elements, one for each possible support pressure (50,100,150,200 and 250 kPa). The first and second hidden layers have each 50 neurons.…”
Section: Deep Q-networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, in the case of the same datasets, Mahdevari et al [15] intended an ML approach, namely support vector regression, to solve a TBM problem. In predicting FPI values, Feng et al [27] and Adoko and Yagiz [28] tried to solve this problem by proposing deep learning and FIS techniques, respectively. A group of other authors tried to solve performance of TBM using other single intelligent approaches like group modeling of data handling, genetic-based and neuro-fuzzy [2,9,[29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the continuous enrichment of sensor types and func-tions, there are numerous variables, also known as parameters or features, available in DT-based modeling for KPI prediction [11], [12]. However, invalid parameters containing irrelevant or redundant information not only increase the overfitting risk and pruning difficulty, but also adversely affect convergence and performance [13]- [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%