1979
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210520225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tunnel hopping current and trap filling in insulating layers

Abstract: The differential equation of trap filling with detrapping is solved at the case of tunnel hopping current conduction in insulating layers. The time dependent de current at constant field is shown to give the average values of time constants τ of tunnel hopping transitions, trap distances xt, and trap densities Nt. Increasing the field step by step one obtains a raw feature of the energy distribution of trap density above the Fermi level. Observation of two well separated time constants indicates strong interfa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the overview on defects in the Introduction), so transport occurs via small polarons. Accordingly, we refer to the Miller–Abrahams hopping rates for TAT processes where Δ E = E f – E i , the energy difference between initial and final state, r ij is the trap–trap distance, and is the localization radius. We assume a delta-like defect-potential for the traps, so the Coulomb potential of initially positively charged traps is neglected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the overview on defects in the Introduction), so transport occurs via small polarons. Accordingly, we refer to the Miller–Abrahams hopping rates for TAT processes where Δ E = E f – E i , the energy difference between initial and final state, r ij is the trap–trap distance, and is the localization radius. We assume a delta-like defect-potential for the traps, so the Coulomb potential of initially positively charged traps is neglected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the reading voltage comes to be higher than 0.5 V, the device does not relax any more, which may be a rough reflection of the energy gap between the trap-energy level and the Fermi level of gold electrode. By calculating from relaxation time of 80 ms according to the phonon tunneling formula in [7], we can obtain the trap barrier about 0.3 V, which implies a coincidence of the two phenomena.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%